Suppr超能文献

[重症监护病房中机械通气患者拔管后序贯性高流量鼻导管给氧治疗的效果分析]

[Analysis of the effect of sequential high-flow nasal canula oxygen therapy in post-extubation mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit].

作者信息

Zhang Peng, Li Zheng, Jiang Haijiao, Zhou Quan, Ye Xiaoming, Yuan Liping, Wu Jiaofeng, Wu Jingyi, Lu Weihua, Tao Xiubin, Jiang Xiaogan

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Anhui Provincial Clinical Research Center for Critical Respiratory Diseases, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China. Corresponding author: Jiang Xiaogan, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jun;33(6):692-696. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210116-00074.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the application effect of high-flow nasal canula oxygen therapy (HFNC) after extubation in patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted. From January 2018 to June 2020, 163 MV patients admitted to Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College were enrolled, and they were divided into HFNC group (82 cases) and traditional oxygen therapy group (81 cases) according to the oxygen therapy model. The patients included in the study were given conventional treatment according to their condition. In the HFNC group, oxygen was inhaled by a nasal high-flow humidification therapy instrument. The gas flow was gradually increased from 35 L/min to 60 L/min according to the patient's tolerance, and the temperature was set at 34-37 centigrade. The fraction of inspiration oxygen (FiO) was set according to the patient's pulse oxygen saturation (SpO) and SpO was maintained at 0.95-0.98. A disposable oxygen mask or nasal cannula was used to inhale oxygen in the traditional oxygen therapy group, and the oxygen flow was 5-8 L/min, maintaining the patient's SpO at 0.95-0.98. The differences in MV duration before extubation, total MV duration, intubation time, reintubation time, extubation failure rate, ICU mortality, ICU stay, and in-hospital stay were compared between the two groups, and weaning failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no significant differences in MV duration before extubation (days: 4.33±3.83 vs. 4.15±3.03), tracheal intubation duration (days: 4.34±1.87 vs. 4.20±3.35), ICU mortality [4.9% (4/82) vs. 3.7% (3/81)] and in-hospital stay [days: 28.93 (15.00, 32.00) vs. 27.69 (15.00, 38.00)] between HFNC group and traditional oxygen therapy group (all P > 0.05). The total MV duration in the HFNC group (days: 4.48±2.43 vs. 5.67±3.84) and ICU stay [days: 6.57 (4.00, 7.00) vs. 7.74 (5.00, 9.00)] were significantly shorter than those in the traditional oxygen therapy group, the reintubation duration of the HFNC group was significantly longer than that of the traditional oxygen therapy group (hours: 35.75±10.15 vs. 19.92±13.12), and the weaning failure rate was significantly lower than that of the traditional oxygen therapy group [4.9% (4/82) vs. 16.0% (13/81), all P < 0.05]. Among the reasons for weaning failure traditional oxygen therapy group had lower ability of airway secretion clearance than that of the HFNC group [8.64% (7/81) vs. 0% (0/82), P < 0.05], there was no statistically differences in the morbidity of heart failure, respiratory muscle weakness, hypoxemia, and change of consciousness between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For MV patients in the ICU, the sequential application of HFNC after extubation can reduce the rate of weaning failure and the incidence of adverse events, shorten the length of ICU stay.

摘要

目的

观察高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法(HFNC)在重症监护病房(ICU)机械通气(MV)患者拔管后的应用效果。

方法

进行一项前瞻性研究。2018年1月至2020年6月,纳入皖南医学院弋矶山医院收治的163例MV患者,根据氧疗模式将其分为HFNC组(82例)和传统氧疗组(81例)。纳入研究的患者根据病情给予常规治疗。HFNC组采用鼻高流量湿化治疗仪吸氧,气流根据患者耐受程度从35L/min逐渐增至60L/min,温度设定为34-37摄氏度。根据患者脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO)设定吸入氧分数(FiO),并将SpO维持在0.95-0.98。传统氧疗组采用一次性氧面罩或鼻导管吸氧,氧流量为5-8L/min,维持患者SpO在0.95-0.98。比较两组患者拔管前MV时长、总MV时长、插管时间、再插管时间、拔管失败率、ICU死亡率、ICU住院时间和住院时间的差异,并分析撤机失败情况。

结果

HFNC组与传统氧疗组在拔管前MV时长(天数:4.33±3.83 vs. 4.15±3.03)、气管插管时长(天数:4.34±1.87 vs. 4.20±3.35)、ICU死亡率[4.9%(4/82)vs. 3.7%(3/81)]和住院时间[天数:28.93(15.00,32.00)vs. 27.69(15.00,38.00)]方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。HFNC组的总MV时长(天数:4.48±2.43 vs. 5.67±3.84)和ICU住院时间[天数:6.57(4.00,7.00)vs. 7.74(5.00,9.00)]显著短于传统氧疗组,HFNC组的再插管时长显著长于传统氧疗组(小时:35.75±10.15 vs. 19.92±13.12),且撤机失败率显著低于传统氧疗组[4.9%(4/82)vs. 16.0%(13/81),均P<0.05]。在撤机失败原因方面,传统氧疗组气道分泌物清除能力低于HFNC组[8.64%(7/81)vs. 0%(0/82),P<0.05],两组在心力衰竭、呼吸肌无力、低氧血症和意识改变的发生率方面差异无统计学意义。

结论

对于ICU中的MV患者,拔管后序贯应用HFNC可降低撤机失败率和不良事件发生率,缩短ICU住院时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验