Suppr超能文献

高风险再插管患者中经鼻高流量与常规氧疗比较:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of Postextubation Outcomes Associated with High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients at High Risk of Reintubation: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 29;35(25):e194. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e194.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liberation and extubation are important for patients supported by mechanical ventilation. Extubation success is related to the duration of an intensive care unit (ICU) stay and mortality rate. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy has physiological and clinical benefits in respiratory care. The present study compared clinical outcomes associated with HFNC and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) among patients at high risk for reintubation.

METHODS

A single-center randomized clinical trial was conducted between March 2018 and June 2019. Sixty adults admitted to the ICU and who were at high-risk of reintubation and met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. "High risk" for reintubation was defined as having at least one of the following risk factors: age > 65 years, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score > 12 points on extubation day, obesity, poor expectoration, airway patency problems, difficult or prolonged weaning, and more than one comorbidity. The primary outcome of interest was reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included duration of ICU and hospital stay, mortality rate, and time to reintubation.

RESULTS

Of 60 patients, 31 received HFNC and 29 received COT (mean age, 78 ± 7.8 vs. 76 ± 6.5 years, respectively). Reintubation rate within 72 hours did not differ between the groups (3 patients [9.7%] vs. 1 patient [3.4%], respectively). Reintubation time was shorter among patients who received COT than among patients who received HFNC (0.5 hour vs. 25 hours), but this difference was not statistically significant. Duration of ICU did not differ between the groups (14.7 ± 9.6 days vs. 13.8 ± 15.7 days, for HFNC and COT, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among patients at high risk for reintubation, compared with COT, HFNC did not reduce the risk of reintubation within 72 hours.

摘要

背景

机械通气支持的患者需要进行拔管。拔管的成功与否与重症监护病房(ICU)入住时间和死亡率有关。高流量鼻导管(HFNC)氧疗在呼吸治疗中有生理和临床益处。本研究比较了 HFNC 和常规氧疗(COT)在有再插管高危因素的患者中的临床结局。

方法

这是一项于 2018 年 3 月至 2019 年 6 月进行的单中心随机临床试验。共纳入 60 名入住 ICU 且有再插管高危因素并符合纳入标准的成年人。再插管的“高危”定义为具有以下危险因素之一:年龄>65 岁、拔管日急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分>12 分、肥胖、咳痰困难、气道通畅问题、撤机困难或时间延长,以及合并症超过一种。主要观察指标为 72 小时内再插管。次要观察指标包括 ICU 和住院时间、死亡率和再插管时间。

结果

60 名患者中,31 名接受 HFNC 治疗,29 名接受 COT(平均年龄分别为 78±7.8 岁和 76±6.5 岁)。72 小时内再插管率在两组间无差异(分别为 3 例[9.7%]和 1 例[3.4%])。接受 COT 的患者再插管时间短于接受 HFNC 的患者(0.5 小时比 25 小时),但差异无统计学意义。两组 ICU 入住时间无差异(HFNC 和 COT 组分别为 14.7±9.6 天和 13.8±15.7 天)。

结论

与 COT 相比,HFNC 并未降低再插管高危患者 72 小时内再插管的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7324267/1672bed3b7d0/jkms-35-e194-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验