Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, Adelaide, 5005, Australia.
SA Aboriginal Chronic Disease Consortium, Wardliparingga, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia.
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01708-8.
Social determinants drive disparities in dental visiting. Disparities can be measured simply by comparing outcomes between groups (inequality) but can also consider concepts of social justice or fairness (inequity). This study aimed to assess differences in dental visiting in the United States in terms of both social inequality and inequity.
Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study-the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015-2016, and participants were US adults aged 30+ years. The outcome of interest, use of oral health care services, was measured in terms of dental visiting in the past 12 months. Disparity was operationalized through education and income. Other characteristics included age, gender, race/ethnicity, main language, country of birth, citizenship and oral health status. To characterize existing inequality in dental service use, we examined bivariate relationships using indices of inequality: the absolute and relative concentration index (ACI and RCI), the slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality (RII) and through concentration curves (CC). Indirect standardization with a non-linear model was used to measure inequity.
A total of 4745 US adults were included. Bivariate analysis showed a gradient by both education and income in dental visiting, with a higher proportion (> 60%) of those with lower educational attainment /lower income having not visited a dentist. The concentration curves showed pro-higher education and income inequality. All measures of absolute and relative indices were negative, indicating that from lower to higher socioeconomic position (education and income), the prevalence of no dental visiting decreased: ACI and RCI estimates were approximately 8% and 20%, while SII and RII estimates were 50% and 30%. After need-standardization, the group with the highest educational level had nearly 2.5 times- and the highest income had near three times less probability of not having a dental visit in the past 12 months than those with the lowest education and income, respectively.
The findings indicate that use of oral health care is threatened by existing social inequalities and inequities, disproportionately burdening disadvantaged populations. Efforts to reduce both oral health inequalities and inequities must start with action in the social, economic and policy spheres.
社会决定因素导致牙科就诊的差异。差异可以通过比较群体之间的结果来简单衡量(不平等),也可以考虑社会正义或公平的概念(不公平)。本研究旨在评估美国牙科就诊在社会不平等和不公平方面的差异。
数据来自横断面研究——国家健康和营养调查(NHANES)2015-2016 年,参与者为 30 岁以上的美国成年人。感兴趣的结果是过去 12 个月内使用口腔保健服务,以牙科就诊衡量。差异通过教育和收入来操作化。其他特征包括年龄、性别、种族/民族、主要语言、出生国家、公民身份和口腔健康状况。为了描述牙科服务使用中现有的不平等,我们使用不平等指数检查了二元关系:绝对和相对集中指数(ACI 和 RCI)、不平等斜率指数(SII)和相对不平等指数(RII)以及集中曲线(CC)。使用非线性模型进行间接标准化来衡量不公平。
共纳入 4745 名美国成年人。二元分析显示,教育和收入都存在就诊梯度,受教育程度较低/收入较低的人群中,有较高比例(>60%)未看过牙医。集中曲线显示出有利于更高教育和收入的不平等。绝对和相对指数的所有指标均为负值,表明从较低到较高的社会经济地位(教育和收入),不看牙医的比例下降:ACI 和 RCI 估计值约为 8%和 20%,而 SII 和 RII 估计值分别为 50%和 30%。经过需求标准化后,教育程度最高的群体在过去 12 个月内没有看牙医的概率几乎是教育程度最低的群体的两倍半,收入最高的群体没有看牙医的概率几乎是收入最低的群体的三分之一。
研究结果表明,口腔保健的使用受到现有社会不平等和不公平的威胁,不成比例地给弱势群体带来负担。减少口腔健康不平等和不公平的努力必须从社会、经济和政策领域的行动开始。