Centre for Health Equity Research, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity Australia, Lvl 2 Cairns Square, Cnr Abbott & Shields St, Qld, 4870, Cairns, Australia.
Ngarruwan Ngadju First Peoples Health and Wellbeing Research Centre, Australian Health Services Research Institute (AHSRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06761-1.
Pandemics such as COVID-19 are a serious public health risk for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, yet primary healthcare systems are not well resourced to respond to such urgent events. At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, a federal government advisory group recommended a rapid, tailored Indigenous response to prevent predicted high morbidity and mortality rates. This paper examines the efforts of one ACCHO, which in the absence of dedicated funding, pivoted its operations in response to COVID-19. Gurriny Yealamucka Health Service (Gurriny) is the only primary healthcare service in the discrete Indigenous community of Yarrabah, Far North Queensland.
The research was conducted at the request of the Chief Executive Officer of Gurriny. Using grounded theory methods, thirteen Gurriny staff and five Yarrabah and government leaders and community members were interviewed, transcripts of these interviews and 59 documents were imported into NVIVO-12 and coded, and key concepts were compared, organised into higher order constructs, then structured into a theoretical framework.
Gurriny responded to COVID-19 by leading with local solutions to keep Yarrabah safe. Four key strategies were implemented: managing the health service operations, realigning services, educating and supporting community, and working across agencies. These strategies were enabled or hindered by five conditions: the governance and leadership capacity of Gurriny, relying on the health taskforce, locking the door, "copping it", and (not) having resources. A year after the first case was experienced in Australia and on the eve of vaccine rollout to Indigenous communities, there have been no COVID-19 cases in Yarrabah.
The success of the locally led, holistic, comprehensive and culturally safe response of Gurriny suggests that such tailored place-based approaches to pandemics (and other health issues) are appropriate, but require dedicated resourcing. Key challenges were the fragmented and rapidly changing government processes, poorly coordinated communication and resource allocation channels, and bottlenecks in hierarchical funding approval processes.
The COVID-19 response in Yarrabah demonstrates the need for governance reform towards greater resourcing and support for local decision making by Aboriginal community-controlled health organisations.
大流行疾病(如 COVID-19)对澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区构成了严重的公共卫生威胁,但初级医疗保健系统并未充分做好应对此类紧急事件的准备。在 COVID-19 大流行开始时,联邦政府咨询小组建议采取快速、量身定制的原住民应对措施,以防止预测的高发病率和死亡率。本文研究了一家原住民社区卫生服务中心(ACCHO)的努力,该中心在没有专用资金的情况下,为应对 COVID-19 而调整了其运营。Gurriny Yealamucka 健康服务中心(Gurriny)是北昆士兰州 Yarrrabah 离散原住民社区唯一的初级保健服务机构。
这项研究是应 Gurriny 的首席执行官的要求进行的。研究采用扎根理论方法,对 13 名 Gurriny 员工以及 5 名 Yarrrabah 和政府领导以及社区成员进行了访谈,将这些访谈的文字记录和 59 份文件导入 NVIVO-12 并进行编码,然后对关键概念进行比较,组织成更高阶的构建,最后构建成一个理论框架。
Gurriny 通过采取本地解决方案来领导保持 Yarrrabah 安全的行动来应对 COVID-19。实施了四项关键战略:管理医疗服务运营、调整服务、教育和支持社区以及跨机构合作。这些战略的实施受到以下五个条件的促进或阻碍:Gurriny 的治理和领导能力、依靠卫生工作队、封锁大门、“应对”和(没有)资源。在澳大利亚首次出现病例一年后,以及向原住民社区推出疫苗前夕,Yarrrabah 没有出现 COVID-19 病例。
Gurriny 主导的、整体的、全面的和文化安全的应对措施取得了成功,这表明针对大流行(和其他健康问题)的这种量身定制的基于地点的方法是合适的,但需要专用资源。主要挑战是政府流程支离破碎且快速变化、沟通和资源分配渠道协调不力以及等级拨款审批流程中的瓶颈。
Yarrrabah 的 COVID-19 应对措施表明,需要进行治理改革,为原住民社区控制的卫生组织提供更多资源和支持,以实现地方决策。