Suppr超能文献

评估有脑出血病史的急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients with a history of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Goh Sherill, Tan Natalie H W, Tan Choon Han, Leow Aloysius S T, Sia Ching-Hui, Ho Andrew F W, Lim Mervyn J R, Yeo Leonard L L, Tan Benjamin Y Q

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Feb;53(2):485-494. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02531-2. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

Abstract

Previous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is labelled as a contraindication for the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) based on expert opinion. However, there is a paucity of data available regarding the benefits and risks of IV-tPA in this population. Recent small retrospective cohort studies reporting its off-label use suggest it may be beneficial. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on IV-tPA use in AIS patients with and without previous ICH. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library from inception to 20 April 2021. Outcomes measured included symptomatic ICH (sICH), 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and 3-month mortality. We included seven retrospective cohort studies comprising 5760 AIS patients who had received IV-tPA, of which 134 had previous ICH. There was no significant difference in the odds of sICH (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.78-3.15, p = 0.21) and 3-month mRS (mRS 0-1: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37-1.65, p = 0.52; mRS 0-2: OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.36-3.15, p = 0.90) between patients with and without previous ICH. There was a trend towards higher 3-month mortality in patients with previous ICH (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.98-2.91, p = 0.06), although this did not reach statistical significance. The use of IV-tPA in AIS patients with previous ICH was not associated with an increased risk of sICH or disability at 3 months. Further larger studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of IV-tPA use in this population.

摘要

基于专家意见,既往有脑出血(ICH)被列为急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者静脉使用组织纤溶酶原激活剂(IV-tPA)的禁忌证。然而,关于IV-tPA用于这一人群的获益和风险,现有数据较少。近期一些报告其超说明书使用情况的小型回顾性队列研究表明,它可能是有益的。本研究旨在调查IV-tPA用于既往有ICH的AIS患者的安全性和有效性。我们对报告IV-tPA用于有或无既往ICH的AIS患者的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了自建库至2021年4月20日的Embase、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆。测量的结局包括症状性脑出血(sICH)、3个月改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分和3个月死亡率。我们纳入了7项回顾性队列研究,共5760例接受IV-tPA治疗的AIS患者,其中134例有既往ICH。有或无既往ICH的患者在发生sICH的几率(比值比[OR]1.57,95%置信区间[CI]0.78 - 3.15,p = 0.21)和3个月mRS评分(mRS 0 - 1:OR 0.78,95%CI 0.37 - 1.65,p = 0.52;mRS 0 - 2:OR 1.07,95%CI 0.36 - 3.15,p = 0.90)方面无显著差异。既往有ICH的患者3个月死亡率有升高趋势(OR 1.69,95%CI 0.98 - 2.91,p = 0.06),尽管未达到统计学显著性。IV-tPA用于既往有ICH的AIS患者与3个月时sICH风险增加或残疾无关。需要进一步开展更大规模的研究来确定IV-tPA用于这一人群的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验