Suppr超能文献

术中像差仪与术前生物测量公式在人工晶状体屈光度选择上的预测准确性比较。

Prediction accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry compared with preoperative biometry formulae for intraocular lens power selection.

作者信息

Ma Jingyi, El-Defrawy Sherif, Lloyd John, Rai Amandeep

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON..

出版信息

Can J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;58(1):2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry to preoperative biometry formulae for predicting intraocular lens power.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Eyes undergoing cataract extraction with at least 1 month of follow-up after surgery at an ambulatory surgical centre in Toronto.

METHODS

Consecutive sample of 228 cataract extractions with monofocal, trifocal, or toric intraocular lens implantation from November 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. The spherical equivalent was predicted preoperatively with Barrett Universal II, Hill-Radial Basis Function (RBF), SRK/T, Holladay I, Holladay II, Haigis, and HofferQ using biometry measurements and intraoperatively with wavefront aberrometry. The primary outcomes were mean prediction error and proportion of eyes with a spherical equivalent within 0.5 D of the refractive target at postoperative month 1.

RESULTS

The analysis included 159 eyes with 52% females and a mean age of 69.4 years. Formulae with the lowest mean prediction error were Hill-RBF (0.32 D ± 0.02 D), Barrett Universal II (0.32 D ± 0.02 D), intraoperative aberrometry (0.32 D ± 0.02 D), SRK/T (0.33 D ± 0.02 D), Holladay II (0.34 D ± 0.03 D), Holladay I (0.35 D ± 0.02 D), Haigis (0.37 D ± 0.02 D), and HofferQ (0.42 D ± 0.02 D). There were no statistically significant differences between intraoperative aberrometry and the preoperative formulae. Formulae with the highest proportion of eyes within 0.5 D of the refractive target were intraoperative aberrometry (82%), Barrett Universal II (81%), Hill-RBF (80%), SRK/T (77%), Holladay II (76%), Holladay I (75%), Haigis (71%), and HofferQ (70%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative aberrometry and modern preoperative biometry formulae are equally effective at reaching the refractive target. In normal eyes, intraoperative aberrometry does not appear to provide any additional benefit to modern prediction formulae.

摘要

目的

比较术中波前像差测量法与术前生物测量公式预测人工晶状体度数的准确性。

设计

回顾性连续病例系列研究。

参与者

在多伦多一家门诊手术中心接受白内障摘除术且术后至少随访1个月的眼睛。

方法

对2017年11月1日至2019年12月31日期间连续进行的228例白内障摘除术(植入单焦点、三焦点或散光人工晶状体)进行抽样。术前使用生物测量数据通过巴雷特通用II公式、希尔径向基函数(RBF)、SRK/T公式、霍拉迪I公式、霍拉迪II公式、海吉斯公式和霍弗Q公式预测等效球镜度,术中使用波前像差测量法进行预测。主要结局指标为术后1个月时的平均预测误差以及等效球镜度在屈光目标值±0.5 D范围内的眼睛比例。

结果

分析纳入了159只眼睛,其中女性占52%,平均年龄为69.4岁。平均预测误差最低的公式依次为:希尔-RBF公式(0.32 D±0.02 D)、巴雷特通用II公式(0.32 D±0.02 D)、术中像差测量法(0.32 D±0.02 D)、SRK/T公式(0.33 D±0.02 D)、霍拉迪II公式(0.34 D±0.03 D)、霍拉迪I公式(0.35 D±0.02 D)、海吉斯公式(0.37 D±0.02 D)和霍弗Q公式(0.42 D±0.02 D)。术中像差测量法与术前公式之间无统计学显著差异。等效球镜度在屈光目标值±0.5 D范围内的眼睛比例最高的公式依次为:术中像差测量法(82%)、巴雷特通用II公式(81%)、希尔-RBF公式(80%)、SRK/T公式(77%)、霍拉迪II公式(76%)、霍拉迪I公式(75%)、海吉斯公式(71%)和霍弗Q公式(70%)。

结论

术中像差测量法与现代术前生物测量公式在达到屈光目标方面同样有效。在正常眼睛中,术中像差测量法似乎并未给现代预测公式带来任何额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验