Lutz D J, Holmes D S, Cramer R E
Department of Psychology, Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield 65804-0095.
J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(6):713-22. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(87)90020-1.
Male and female subjects first worked on a cognitive task under conditions of either low or high challenge followed by a physical exercise task. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, subjective arousal, subjective fatigue, and preferred levels of challenge for subsequent tasks were assessed. The results indicated that subjects with high Hard-Driving scores reported lower subjective arousal while working on the cognitive tasks and preferred to work on more challenging cognitive and physical exercise tasks in a subsequent phase of the experiment. In contrast, subjects with high Hard-Driving scores, high Speed-Impatience scores, or high overall Type A scores did not evidence higher physiological arousal in response to either the cognitive or the physical exercise tasks. Utilization of the components of the Type A pattern yielded greater specificity of results and suggests that Type A's are at greater risk from coronary disease for reasons other than those that have been traditionally hypothesized.
男性和女性受试者首先在低挑战或高挑战条件下进行一项认知任务,随后进行一项体育锻炼任务。评估了心率、收缩压、舒张压、主观唤醒、主观疲劳以及后续任务的偏好挑战水平。结果表明,具有高“拼命工作”得分的受试者在进行认知任务时报告的主观唤醒较低,并且在实验的后续阶段更喜欢从事更具挑战性的认知和体育锻炼任务。相比之下,具有高“拼命工作”得分、高“速度不耐烦”得分或高总体A型得分的受试者在面对认知或体育锻炼任务时,并没有表现出更高的生理唤醒。对A型模式各组成部分的运用产生了更具特异性的结果,并表明A型人格患冠心病的风险更高,原因并非传统上所假设的那些。