Suppr超能文献

教练对运动员身体表现的评估:对运动员进行分析时,需要主观和客观的测量方法。

Coaches' Assessment of Players Physical Performance: Subjective and Objective Measures are needed when Profiling Players.

机构信息

Carnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

England Performance Unit, Rugby Football League, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Aug;22(8):1177-1187. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1956600. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

Abstract

This mixed methods study aimed to assess the agreement between coaches ranking of youth rugby league players compared against objective physical performance data and gather coaches' subjective descriptions of their players performance. Five hundred and eight male rugby league players (U16  = 255, U18  = 253) completed a fitness testing battery of anthropometric and physical performance measures. Subsequently, 22 rugby ( = 11) and strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches ( = 11) ranked each player's physical qualities using a 4-point Likert scale (1 - top 25%; 2-25-50%; 3-50-75%; and 4 - bottom 25%) and described their performance. U16 S&C coaches displayed fair agreement when assessing players body mass (39.3%, κ = 0.20). U18 rugby coaches demonstrated fair agreement for strength and size (42.5%, κ = 0.23) and body mass (48.7%, κ = 0.31) whilst both U18 rugby and S&C coaches showed fair agreement levels for endurance (39.8%, κ = 0.25, 44.3%, κ = 0.29), respectively. Three higher-order themes were identified from coaches' descriptions of players including physical, rugby and attitude characteristics when evaluating performance. Overall, coaches cannot accurately assess players physical performance against fitness testing data. Though, findings suggest coaches adopt a multidimensional approach when evaluating players performance. Practitioners within talent development systems should utilise both objective and subjective assessments when making decisions regarding players performance.Rugby and S&C coaches cannot accurately assess all aspects of players physical performance.The greatest assessment agreement was for body mass, strength and size, and endurance, while the poorest were for strength, acceleration, and maximum speed.Rugby and S&C coaches considered rugby, physical and attitude attributes when evaluating players.Findings highlight the complex nature of physical profiling. Subjective and objective measures are required to provide an accurate description of players physical performance.

摘要

这项混合方法研究旨在评估教练对青年橄榄球联盟球员的排名与客观身体表现数据之间的一致性,并收集教练对球员表现的主观描述。508 名男性橄榄球联盟球员(U16=255 人,U18=253 人)完成了一项身体测试电池的人体测量和身体表现测量。随后,22 名橄榄球(=11 名)和力量与体能(S&C)教练(=11 名)使用 4 分李克特量表(1-前 25%;2-25-50%;3-50-75%;和 4-后 25%)对每名球员的身体素质进行排名,并描述了他们的表现。U16 S&C 教练在评估球员体重时表现出了适度的一致性(39.3%,κ=0.20)。U18 橄榄球教练在力量和体型(42.5%,κ=0.23)和体重(48.7%,κ=0.31)方面表现出适度的一致性,而 U18 橄榄球和 S&C 教练在耐力方面表现出适度的一致性(39.8%,κ=0.25,44.3%,κ=0.29)。从教练对球员表现的描述中确定了三个更高层次的主题,包括身体、橄榄球和态度特征。总体而言,教练无法根据体能测试数据准确评估球员的身体表现。尽管如此,研究结果表明,教练在评估球员表现时采用了多维方法。在做出关于球员表现的决策时,人才发展系统内的从业者应该同时使用客观和主观评估。橄榄球和 S&C 教练无法准确评估球员身体表现的所有方面。最大的评估一致性是体重、力量和体型以及耐力,而最差的是力量、加速度和最大速度。橄榄球和 S&C 教练在评估球员时考虑了橄榄球、身体和态度属性。研究结果突出了身体特征的复杂性。需要主观和客观的测量来准确描述球员的身体表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验