Suppr超能文献

食草动物吃什么、怎么吃以及吃多少?用于评估放牧动物采食量的连续咬嚼监测方法。

What, how, and how much do herbivores eat? The Continuous Bite Monitoring method for assessing forage intake of grazing animals.

作者信息

Soares Bolzan Anderson Michel, Szymczak Leonardo S, Nadin Laura, Bonnet Olivier Jean F, Wallau Marcelo O, de Moraes Anibal, Moraes Renata F, Monteiro Alda L G, Carvalho Paulo C F

机构信息

Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre RS Brazil.

Department of Crop Production and Protection Federal University of Paraná Curitiba PR Brazil.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun 25;11(14):9217-9226. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7477. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Determining herbage intake is pivotal for studies on grazing ecology. Direct observation of animals allows describing the interactions of animals with the pastoral environment along the complex grazing process. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the reliability of the continuous bite monitoring (CBM) method in determining herbage intake in grazing sheep compared to the standard double-weighing technique method during 45-min feeding bouts; evaluate the degree of agreement between the two techniques; and to test the effect of different potential sources of variation on the reliability of the CBM. The CBM method has been used to describe the intake behavior of grazing herbivores. In this study, we evaluated a new approach to this method, that is, whether it is a good proxy for determining the intake of grazing animals. Three experiments with grazing sheep were carried out in which we tested for different sources of variations, such as the number of observers, level of detail of bite coding grid, forage species, forage allowance, sward surface height heterogeneity, experiment site, and animal weight, to determine the short-term intake rate (45 min). Observer (  = 0.018,  = 0.078, and  = 0.006), sward surface height (  < 0.001), total number of bites observed per grazing session (  < 0.001 and  < 0.001), and sward depletion (  < 0.001) were found to affect the absolute error of intake estimation. The results showed a high correlation and agreement between the two methods in the three experiments, although intake was overestimation by CBM on experiments 2 and 3 (181.38 and 214.24 units, respectively). This outcome indicates the potential of CBM to determining forage intake with the benefit of a greater level of detail on foraging patterns and components of the diet. Furthermore, direct observation is not invasive nor disrupts natural animal behavior.

摘要

确定牧草摄入量对于放牧生态学研究至关重要。直接观察动物能够描述动物在复杂放牧过程中与牧区环境的相互作用。本研究的目的是评估连续咬嚼监测(CBM)方法在确定放牧绵羊牧草摄入量方面的可靠性,并与45分钟采食期的标准双称重技术方法进行比较;评估两种技术之间的一致性程度;并测试不同潜在变异来源对CBM可靠性的影响。CBM方法已被用于描述放牧食草动物的采食行为。在本研究中,我们评估了该方法的一种新途径,即它是否是确定放牧动物摄入量的良好替代方法。对放牧绵羊进行了三项实验,我们测试了不同的变异来源,如观察者数量、咬嚼编码网格的详细程度、饲草种类、饲草供应量、草地表面高度异质性、实验地点和动物体重,以确定短期采食率(45分钟)。发现观察者(F = 0.018,P = 0.078,F = 0.006)、草地表面高度(P < 0.001)、每次放牧期间观察到的咬嚼总数(P < 0.001和P < 0.001)以及草地损耗(P < 0.001)会影响摄入量估计的绝对误差。结果表明,在三项实验中两种方法之间具有高度相关性和一致性,尽管在实验2和3中CBM高估了摄入量(分别为181.38和214.24单位)。这一结果表明CBM在确定牧草摄入量方面具有潜力,其优势在于能更详细地了解采食模式和饮食组成部分。此外,直接观察不会造成侵入性影响,也不会干扰动物的自然行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1065/8293712/e18a58319130/ECE3-11-9217-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验