Suppr超能文献

走步称重法评估对绵羊短期个体采食量的估计。

An assessment of Walk-over-Weighing to estimate short-term individual forage intake in sheep.

机构信息

1INRA UMR868,Systèmes d'Elevage Méditerranées et Tropicaux (SELMET),F-34060 Montpellier,France.

2Faculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos- FZEA/USP,Universidade de São Paulo (USP),Campus da USP Fernando Costa,Pirassununga,São Paulo,SP 13635-900,Brazil.

出版信息

Animal. 2018 Jun;12(6):1174-1181. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117002609. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Abstract

The main limitation for determining feed efficiency of freely grazing ruminants is measurement of daily individual feed intake. This paper describes an investigation that assessed a method for estimating intake of forage based on changes in BW of ewes. A total of 24 dry and non-pregnant Romane ewes (12 hoggets, HOG; mean±SD 51.8±2.8 kg BW; body condition score (BCS) 2.6±0.2; and 12 adults, ADU; 60.4±8.5 kg BW; BCS 2.7±0.8) were selected for the study and moved from their rangeland system to a confined pen with controlled conditions and equipped with individual automatic feeders. The experiment lasted for 28 days (21 days adaptation and 7 days feed intake measurement). Ewes were fed hay and trained to use the electronic feeders (one feeding station per ewe) in which actual daily intake (H intake24) was measured. The pens were designed to maximize movement of trained ewes through an automated Walk-over-Weighing device, by using water and mineral salts as attractants. Total individual intake of hay measured in the automatic feeder at each meal (H intake) was compared with indirect estimates of feed intake determined using differences in the BW of the ewes (∆BW) before and 1 h following morning and afternoon feeding at fixed times. The BW, BCS, H intake, H intake24, as well as plasma non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), glucose and insulin profiles were determined. The BW was higher in ADU v. HOG but BCS was not affected by parity. The H intake24 was affected by day of experiment as a consequence of reduced availability and intake of water on one day. Plasma glucose, NEFA and insulin were not affected by parity or day of experiment. The H Intake was and ∆BW tended to be higher in the morning in HOG, whereas H intake was and ∆BW tended to be higher in ADU at the afternoon meal. Irrespective of parity or feeding time, there was very strong correlation (r 2=0.93) between H intake and ∆BW. This relationship confirms that our indirect method of estimating individual forage intake was reliable within the strictly controlled conditions of the present experiment. The method appears suitable for use in short-term intensive group feeding situations, and has potential to be further developed for longer-term forage intake studies, with a view to developing a method for freely grazing ruminants.

摘要

自由放牧反刍动物确定饲料效率的主要限制因素是测定每日个体采食量。本文描述了一种基于绵羊体重变化评估牧草采食量的方法。共选择了 24 只干燥且非妊娠的罗曼羊(12 只羔羊,HOG;平均体重 51.8±2.8kgBW;体况评分(BCS)2.6±0.2;和 12 只成年羊,ADU;60.4±8.5kgBW;BCS 2.7±0.8),并将其从牧场系统转移到一个有控制条件的封闭围栏,并配备了个体自动饲养器。实验持续了 28 天(21 天适应和 7 天采食量测量)。羊被喂食干草,并训练它们使用电子饲养器(每只羊一个饲养站),其中实际每日摄入量(H intake24)被测量。围栏的设计最大限度地增加了经过训练的绵羊通过自动称重装置的移动,使用水和矿物质盐作为吸引力。在每次进餐时,在自动饲养器中测量的每只羊的总个体干草摄入量(H intake)与使用绵羊 BW 差异(∆BW)的间接饲料摄入量估计值进行比较,BW 是在早晨和下午固定时间进食前和 1 小时后测量的。测定了 BW、BCS、H intake、H intake24 以及血浆非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)、葡萄糖和胰岛素谱。ADU 的 BW 高于 HOG,但 BW 不受胎次的影响。由于某一天水的供应和摄入量减少,实验日对 H intake24 有影响。血浆葡萄糖、NEFA 和胰岛素不受胎次或实验日的影响。HOG 羊在早晨的 H intake 和 ∆BW 较高,而 ADU 羊在下午的 H intake 和 ∆BW 较高。无论胎次或饲喂时间如何,H intake 和 ∆BW 之间都存在很强的相关性(r 2=0.93)。这种关系证实了我们在本实验严格控制条件下间接估计个体牧草摄入量的方法是可靠的。该方法似乎适用于短期集约化群饲情况,并有可能进一步开发用于长期牧草摄入量研究的方法,以期为自由放牧反刍动物开发一种方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验