Muelleman Thomas J, Maxwell Anne K, Peng Kevin A, Brackmann Derald E, Lekovic Gregory P, Mehta Gautam U
Division of Neurootology, House Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Division of Neurosurgery, House Institute, Los Angeles, California, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jul;82(Suppl 3):e184-e189. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712180. Epub 2020 May 26.
Data regarding the surgical advantages and anatomic constraints of a hearing-preserving endoscopic-assisted retrolabyrinthine approach to the IAC are scarce. This study aimed to define the minimum amount of retrosigmoid dural exposure necessary for endoscopic exposure of the IAC and the surgical freedom of motion afforded by this approach. Presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approaches were performed on fresh cadaveric heads. The IAC was exposed under endoscopic guidance. The retrosigmoid posterior fossa dura was decompressed until the fundus of the IAC was exposed. Surgical freedom of motion at the fundus was calculated after both retrolabyrinthine and translabyrinthine approaches. The IAC was entirely exposed in nine specimens with a median length of 12 mm (range: 10-13 mm). Complete IAC exposure could be achieved with 1 cm of retrosigmoid dural exposure in eight of nine mastoids. For the retrolabyrinthine approach, the median anterior-posterior surgical freedom was 13 degrees (range: 6-23 degrees) compared with 46 degrees (range: 36-53 degrees) for the translabyrinthine approach ( = 0.014). For the retrolabyrinthine approach, the median superior-inferior surgical freedom was 40 degrees (range 33-46 degrees) compared with 47 degrees (range: 42-51 degrees) for the translabyrinthine approach ( = 0.022). Using endoscopic assistance, the retrolabyrinthine approach can expose the entire IAC. We recommend at least 1.5 cm of retrosigmoid posterior fossa dura exposure for this approach. Although this strategy provides significantly less instrument freedom of motion in both the horizontal and vertical axes than the translabyrinthine approach, it may be appropriate for carefully selected patients with intact hearing and small-to-medium sized tumors involving the IAC.
关于保留听力的内镜辅助迷路后入路至内听道(IAC)的手术优势和解剖学限制的数据很少。本研究旨在确定内镜暴露IAC所需的乙状窦后硬脑膜暴露的最小量以及该入路提供的手术活动自由度。
在新鲜尸体头部进行乙状窦前迷路后入路。在内镜引导下暴露IAC。减压乙状窦后颅后窝硬脑膜,直到暴露IAC底部。在迷路后和经迷路入路后计算在IAC底部的手术活动自由度。
在9个标本中IAC完全暴露,中位长度为12毫米(范围:10 - 13毫米)。9个乳突中的8个通过1厘米的乙状窦后硬脑膜暴露可实现IAC的完全暴露。对于迷路后入路,前后方向的中位手术活动自由度为13度(范围:6 - 23度),而经迷路入路为46度(范围:36 - 53度)(P = 0.014)。对于迷路后入路,上下方向的中位手术活动自由度为40度(范围33 - 46度),而经迷路入路为47度(范围:42 - 51度)(P = 0.022)。
使用内镜辅助,迷路后入路可暴露整个IAC。我们建议该入路至少暴露1.5厘米的乙状窦后颅后窝硬脑膜。尽管该策略在水平和垂直轴上提供的器械活动自由度比经迷路入路明显少,但它可能适用于精心挑选的听力完好且患有累及IAC的中小尺寸肿瘤的患者。