Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL.
Division of Hospital Medicine (Palliative Care) Department of Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e020949. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020949. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Background Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) implanted as destination therapy may receive suboptimal preparation for and care at the end of life, but there is limited understanding of the reasons for these shortcomings. Exploring perceptions of individuals (caregivers and clinicians) who are closely involved in the end-of-life experience with patients with destination therapy LVADs can help identify key opportunities for improving care. Methods and Results We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 7 bereaved caregivers of patients with destination therapy LVADs and 10 interdisciplinary LVAD clinicians. Interviews explored perceptions of preparing for end of life, communicating about end of life, and providing and receiving end-of-life care, and were analyzed using a 2-step team-based inductive approach to coding and analysis. Six themes pertaining to end-of-life experiences were derived: (1) timing end-of-life discussions in the setting of unpredictable illness trajectories, (2) prioritizing end-of-life preparation and decision-making, (3) communicating uncertainty while providing support and hope, (4) lack of consensus on responsibility for end-of-life discussions, (5) perception of the LVAD team as invincible, and (6) divergent perceptions of LVAD withdrawal. Conclusions This study revealed 6 unique aspects of end-of-life care for patients with destination therapy LVADs as reported by clinicians and caregivers. Themes coalesced around communication, team-based care, and challenges unique to patients with LVADs at end of life. Programmatic changes may address some aspects, including training clinicians in LVAD-specific communication skills. Other aspects, such as standardizing the role of the palliative care team and developing practical interventions that enable timely advance care planning during LVAD care, will require multifaceted interventions.
作为终末期治疗手段植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的患者在生命末期可能无法得到充分的准备和关怀,但对于这些不足的原因却知之甚少。探索与接受终末期治疗的 LVAD 患者密切相关的个体(护理人员和临床医生)对生命末期的看法,有助于确定改善护理的关键机会。
我们对 7 名接受终末期治疗的 LVAD 患者的临终护理的丧亲护理人员和 10 名 LVAD 临床医生进行了半结构化定性访谈。访谈探讨了对临终准备、临终沟通以及临终关怀的看法,并使用基于团队的两步归纳式编码和分析方法进行了分析。得出了 6 个与临终体验相关的主题:(1)在不可预测的疾病轨迹背景下安排临终讨论的时机;(2)优先进行临终准备和决策;(3)在提供支持和希望的同时传达不确定性;(4)对临终讨论责任缺乏共识;(5)认为 LVAD 团队不可战胜;(6)对 LVAD 撤除的看法存在分歧。
本研究揭示了临床医生和护理人员报告的接受终末期治疗的 LVAD 患者的 6 个独特的临终护理方面。这些主题围绕沟通、团队护理以及 LVAD 患者临终时面临的独特挑战而凝聚在一起。方案的改变可能会解决一些方面的问题,包括培训临床医生使用 LVAD 特定的沟通技巧。其他方面,如标准化姑息治疗团队的角色以及制定实用的干预措施,以在 LVAD 护理期间实现及时的预先护理计划,将需要多方面的干预措施。