Hughes Ryan T, Porosnicu Mercedes, Levine Beverly J, Lycan Thomas W, Shenker Rachel F, Frizzell Bart A, Greven Kathryn M
Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Depatment of Internal Medicine-Section of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Oct;65(6):796-805. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13292. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using high-dose cisplatin (HDC) is standard for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); weekly cisplatin (WC) is an alternative. We aim to compare retrospectively the survival and disease control outcomes between these regimens in our institutional experience.
Patients with stage III-IV HNSCC treated with definitive or postoperative CRT between 2012 and 2018 were identified. Patients were stratified by intent-to-treat CRT. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were generated and multivariable Cox models were performed.
193 patients were treated with concurrent HDC (n = 69), WC at 40 mg/m (WC40, n = 88) or WC at <40 mg/m (WC<40, n = 36). Treatment intent was definitive in 74% and adjuvant in 26%. Baseline differences included age, performance status and HPV status. Cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m was achieved in 89% (HDC), 86% (WC40) and 25% (WC<40, P < 0.0001). For HDC, WC40 and WC<40, 2-year OS rates were 87%, 77%, 60% and 2-year DFS rates were 75%, 68% and 52%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed gender, performance status, primary site, T/N stage and chemotherapy as predictive of OS. Primary site, T/N stage and chemotherapy regimen were associated with DFS. Compared with HDC, no differences in locoregional control (LRC) or distant metastasis were observed between groups.
Concurrent HDC is associated with increased total cisplatin intensity, OS and DFS compared with weekly cisplatin regimens. LRC was not associated with chemotherapy regimen. HDC remains the standard of care; WC40 is a reasonable alternative that does not appear to sacrifice LRC.
对于局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者,使用高剂量顺铂(HDC)的同步放化疗(CRT)是标准治疗方案;每周一次顺铂(WC)是一种替代方案。我们旨在回顾性比较在我们机构经验中这些方案之间的生存和疾病控制结果。
确定2012年至2018年间接受根治性或术后CRT治疗的III-IV期HNSCC患者。患者按意向性治疗CRT进行分层。生成总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),并进行多变量Cox模型分析。
193例患者接受了同步HDC治疗(n = 69)、40mg/m²的WC治疗(WC40,n = 88)或低于40mg/m²的WC治疗(WC<40,n = 36)。治疗意向为根治性的占74%,辅助性的占26%。基线差异包括年龄、体能状态和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)状态。89%(HDC)、86%(WC40)和25%(WC<40,P<0.0001)的患者顺铂累积剂量≥200mg/m²。对于HDC、WC40和WC<40,2年总生存率分别为87%、77%、60%,2年无病生存率分别为75%、68%和52%。多变量分析显示,性别、体能状态、原发部位、T/N分期和化疗是总生存期的预测因素。原发部位、T/N分期和化疗方案与无病生存期相关。与HDC相比,各治疗组间在局部区域控制(LRC)或远处转移方面未观察到差异。
与每周一次顺铂方案相比,同步HDC与顺铂总剂量强度增加、总生存期和无病生存期延长相关。局部区域控制与化疗方案无关。HDC仍然是标准治疗;WC40是一种合理的替代方案,似乎不会牺牲局部区域控制。