依瑞奈尤单抗预防高频发作性和慢性偏头痛的长期(48 周)有效性、安全性和耐受性:EARLY 2 研究结果。
Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study.
机构信息
Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.
San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy.
出版信息
Headache. 2021 Oct;61(9):1351-1363. doi: 10.1111/head.14194. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in a real-world migraine population, looking for putative predictors of responsiveness.
BACKGROUND
Erenumab proved to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in the prevention of episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) in long-term extension studies of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with no more than two (EM) or three (CM) prior preventive treatment failures.
METHODS
A 48-week, multicenter, longitudinal cohort real-life study was conducted at 15 headache centers across eight Italian regions between December 20, 2018 and July 31, 2020. We considered all consecutive patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or CM aged 18-65 years. Each patient was treated with erenumab 70 mg, administered monthly. The dose was switched to 140 mg in nonresponders and in responders who had become nonresponders for at least 4 weeks. Change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) or monthly headache days (MHDs) at Weeks 45-48 compared with baseline was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints encompassed variation in monthly analgesic intake, achievement of a ≥50%, ≥75%, or 100% reduction in migraine or headache days, and any change in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Headache Impact Test-6 scores (HIT-6) during the same time interval.
RESULTS
A total of 242 patients with migraine received at least one dose of erenumab 70 mg and were considered for safety analysis, whereas 221 received a monthly erenumab dose for ≥48 weeks and were included in the effectiveness and safety analysis set. All patients had previously been treated unsuccessfully with ≥3 migraine-preventive medication classes. From baseline to Weeks 45-48, erenumab treatment reduced MMD by 4.3 ± 5.3 (mean ± SD) in patients with HFEM, and MHD by 12.8 ± 8.9 (mean ± SD) in subjects with CM. VAS and HIT-6 scores were decreased by 1.8 ± 1.9 (mean ± SD) and 12.3 ± 11 (mean ± SD) in HFEM, and by 3.0 ± 2.2 (mean ± SD) and 13.1 ± 11.2 (mean ± SD) in CM. Median monthly analgesic intake passed from 11.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 10.0-13.0) to 5 (IQR 2.0-8.0) in HFEM and from 20.0 (IQR 15.0-30.0) to 6.0 (IQR 3.8-10.0) in CM. The ≥50% responders were 56.1% (32/57) in HFEM and 75.6% (124/164) in CM; ≥75% responders were 31.6% (18/57) and 44.5% (73/164); and 100% responders were 8.8% (5/57) and 1.2% (2/164), respectively. At Week 48, 83.6% (137/164) of patients with CM had reverted to EM. Erenumab was safe and well tolerated. Responsiveness to erenumab was positively associated with cutaneous allodynia (OR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.52-19.41; p = 0.009) in HFEM. In patients with CM, ≥50% responsiveness was positively associated with male sex (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.03-8.7; p = 0.044) and baseline migraine frequency (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20; p = 0.001) and negatively associated with psychiatric comorbidities (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; p = 0.023) and prior treatment failures (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS
Long-term (48-week) erenumab treatment provides sustained effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in real-life patients with HFEM or CM with ≥3 prior preventive treatment failures. The dose of 140 mg was required in most patients along the study and should be taken into consideration as the starting dose. Allodynia (in HFEM), male sex, and baseline migraine frequency (in CM) might represent positive responsiveness predictors. Conversely, psychiatric comorbidities and multiple prior preventive treatment failures could be negative predictors in patients with CM.
目的
评估依瑞奈尤单抗在真实世界偏头痛人群中的长期疗效、安全性和耐受性,并寻找其有效性的预测因素。
背景
依瑞奈尤单抗在预防发作性偏头痛(EM)和慢性偏头痛(CM)的双盲、安慰剂对照的长期扩展研究中,被证明是有效、安全且耐受良好的,这些研究的患者在入组前最多有两次(EM)或三次(CM)预防性治疗失败。
方法
2018 年 12 月 20 日至 2020 年 7 月 31 日,在意大利 8 个地区的 15 个头痛中心进行了一项为期 48 周、多中心、纵向队列真实世界研究。我们纳入了所有年龄在 18-65 岁、高频率发作性偏头痛(HFEM)或 CM 的连续患者。每位患者每月接受依瑞奈尤单抗 70mg 治疗。对于无应答者和应答者但至少 4 周后无应答者,将剂量转换为 140mg。主要疗效终点是第 45-48 周时每月偏头痛发作天数(MMD)或每月头痛发作天数(MHD)与基线相比的变化。次要终点包括每月镇痛药摄入量的变化、偏头痛或头痛天数减少≥50%、≥75%或 100%,以及在相同时间间隔内视觉模拟量表(VAS)和头痛影响测试-6 评分(HIT-6)的任何变化。
结果
共 242 例偏头痛患者接受了至少一剂依瑞奈尤单抗 70mg,并进行了安全性分析,而 221 例患者接受了依瑞奈尤单抗每月剂量治疗≥48 周,并纳入了有效性和安全性分析集。所有患者此前均接受过≥3 种偏头痛预防药物治疗,但均未成功。从基线到第 45-48 周,依瑞奈尤单抗治疗使 HFEM 患者的 MMD 减少了 4.3±5.3(均值±标准差),CM 患者的 MHD 减少了 12.8±8.9(均值±标准差)。VAS 和 HIT-6 评分在 HFEM 中分别降低了 1.8±1.9(均值±标准差)和 12.3±11(均值±标准差),在 CM 中分别降低了 3.0±2.2(均值±标准差)和 13.1±11.2(均值±标准差)。HFEM 中每月镇痛药摄入量中位数从 11.0(四分位距[IQR]10.0-13.0)降至 5(IQR 2.0-8.0),CM 中从 20.0(IQR 15.0-30.0)降至 6(IQR 3.8-10.0)。HFEM 中≥50%应答者为 56.1%(32/57),CM 中为 75.6%(124/164);≥75%应答者为 31.6%(18/57)和 44.5%(73/164);100%应答者为 8.8%(5/57)和 1.2%(2/164)。在第 48 周时,CM 中 83.6%(137/164)的患者偏头痛转为 EM。依瑞奈尤单抗安全性良好,耐受性良好。依瑞奈尤单抗的有效性与皮肤感觉过敏(OR:5.44,95%CI:1.52-19.41;p=0.009)呈正相关,在 HFEM 中。在 CM 患者中,≥50%的应答与男性(OR:2.99,95%CI:1.03-8.7;p=0.044)和基线偏头痛频率(OR:1.12,95%CI:1.05-1.20;p=0.001)呈正相关,与精神共病(OR:0.37,95%CI:0.15-0.87;p=0.023)和既往治疗失败(OR:0.77,95%CI:0.64-0.92;p=0.004)呈负相关。
结论
依瑞奈尤单抗在有≥3 次预防性治疗失败的高频率发作性偏头痛或慢性偏头痛的真实世界患者中进行了为期 48 周的长期治疗,提供了持续的有效性、安全性和耐受性。在研究过程中,大多数患者需要使用 140mg 剂量,应将其作为起始剂量。皮肤感觉过敏(HFEM)、男性和基线偏头痛频率(CM)可能是有效性的预测因素。相反,精神共病和多次预防性治疗失败可能是 CM 患者的负性预测因素。