Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;23(11):2948-2954. doi: 10.1111/codi.15837. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
The aim of this work was to compare the results of elective minimally invasive surgery between patients with complicated sigmoid diverticulitis and those with uncomplicated disease.
An institutional review board-approved database was searched for all consecutive patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic, hand-assisted and robotic sigmoidectomy, for diverticulitis between 2010 and 2017; they were classified according to the modified Hinchey classification as having complicated (abscess, fistula, stricture, obstruction, bleeding or previous perforation) versus uncomplicated disease. Data recorded included baseline demographics, indications for surgery, operative details and complications.
Three hundred and twenty-five patients underwent elective sigmoidectomy for complicated (n = 105) and uncomplicated (n = 220) diverticulitis. Surgical indications for complicated disease were abscess (n = 74), stricture (n = 14), fistula (n = 28) and bleeding (n = 7). The two groups were statistically comparable for age, gender, body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Patients with complicated disease had higher rates of concomitant loop ileostomy creation (9.5% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and synchronous resections (9.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.01), higher volumes of blood loss (177 ± 140 vs. 125 ± 92 ml, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (5.6 ± 3 vs. 4.8 ± 2 days, p = 0.04) and longer operating time (218.2 ± 59 vs. 185.8 ± 63 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leakage (3% vs. 1%, p = 0.3), conversion to laparotomy (4.8% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.3) or overall complications (36% vs. 25.9%, p = 0.06) for complicated versus uncomplicated disease, respectively.
Minimally invasive surgery for complicated diverticulitis resulted in higher rates of construction of proximal ileostomy and synchronous resections and longer operating times and length of hospital stay. Otherwise, it has outcomes that are not significantly different from the results recorded in patients with uncomplicated disease.
本研究旨在比较合并与未合并复杂症状的乙状结肠憩室炎患者行择期微创手术的结果。
检索了 2010 年至 2017 年期间所有接受择期微创手术(包括腹腔镜、手助式和机器人乙状结肠切除术)治疗憩室炎的连续患者的机构审查委员会批准的数据库,根据改良 Hinchey 分类将患者分为合并(脓肿、瘘管、狭窄、梗阻、出血或既往穿孔)与未合并复杂症状疾病。记录的数据包括基线人口统计学资料、手术指征、手术细节和并发症。
325 例患者因合并(n=105)和未合并(n=220)憩室炎而行择期乙状结肠切除术。复杂疾病的手术指征包括脓肿(n=74)、狭窄(n=14)、瘘管(n=28)和出血(n=7)。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会评分方面具有统计学可比性。患有复杂疾病的患者行近端回肠造口术的比例更高(9.5%比 0.9%,p<0.001),同步切除的比例更高(9.5%比 2.7%,p=0.01),出血量更大(177±140ml 比 125±92ml,p<0.001),住院时间更长(5.6±3 天比 4.8±2 天,p=0.04),手术时间更长(218.2±59 分钟比 185.8±63 分钟,p<0.001)。复杂与未合并疾病患者的吻合口漏(3%比 1%,p=0.3)、中转开腹(4.8%比 2.3%,p=0.3)或总体并发症(36%比 25.9%,p=0.06)发生率无显著差异。
对于合并乙状结肠憩室炎的患者,微创治疗导致近端回肠造口术和同步切除术的比例更高,手术时间和住院时间更长。然而,与未合并复杂症状的患者相比,其结果并没有显著差异。