Bartus Christine M, Lipof Tamar, Sarwar C M Shahbaz, Vignati Paul V, Johnson Kristina H, Sardella William V, Cohen Jeffrey L
Department of Surgery , University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):233-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0849-8.
Traditionally, diverticular fistula was thought to be a contraindication for laparoscopic colectomy. The advent of hand-assisted laparoscopy has allowed repair of a diverticular fistula to be technically feasible laparoscopically. We present our experience with laparoscopic colectomy in patients with diverticular fistulas.
Patients with colovesical or colovaginal fistulas secondary to diverticular disease were consecutively entered into a database over a five-year period. All operations were electively performed by a single group of colorectal surgeons. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, type of surgery, operating time, hospital length of stay, and early and late complications were recovered by chart review. These results were then compared to results from a group of patients who had undergone elective laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent diverticulitis during the same period by the same group of surgeons.
Altogether, 40 consecutive operations for diverticular fistulas were performed, 36 of which were started laparoscopically (90 percent). The average patient age was 65 years and the average American Society of Anesthesiologists class was 2. Patient demographics were similar among the group with recurrent diverticulitis (n = 149). The average hospital stay was 6.2 days for the fistula group and 4.4 days in the recurrent diverticulitis group. The average operating time was 220 minutes for the fistula group vs. 176 minutes for the uncomplicated group (P < 0.002). The conversion rate was significantly higher in the fistula group (25 percent vs. 5 percent, P < 0.001). There were no postoperative anastomotic leaks or bleeding episodes requiring reoperation in the fistula group.
Diverticular fistula should no longer be considered a contraindication for laparoscopic colectomy. These cases are more complex, as evidenced by the longer operating times and higher conversion rates when compared with resections for uncomplicated recurrent diverticulitis. Although the length of hospital stay was longer for patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for diverticular fistula, those whose operations were completed laparoscopically had the same outcome as patients with uncomplicated disease. We anticipate that minimally invasive surgery will become the standard of care for colovesical fistula, as it now is for uncomplicated diverticular disease.
传统上,憩室瘘被认为是腹腔镜结肠切除术的禁忌证。手辅助腹腔镜技术的出现使憩室瘘的腹腔镜修复在技术上成为可能。我们介绍我们在憩室瘘患者中进行腹腔镜结肠切除术的经验。
在五年期间,将因憩室病继发的结肠膀胱瘘或结肠阴道瘘患者连续纳入数据库。所有手术均由一组结直肠外科医生择期进行。通过病历审查获取患者人口统计学资料、美国麻醉医师协会分级、手术类型、手术时间、住院时间以及早期和晚期并发症情况。然后将这些结果与同期由同一组外科医生为复发性憩室炎进行择期腹腔镜结肠切除术的一组患者的结果进行比较。
总共进行了40例连续的憩室瘘手术,其中36例开始采用腹腔镜手术(90%)。患者平均年龄为65岁,美国麻醉医师协会平均分级为2级。复发性憩室炎组(n = 149)的患者人口统计学资料与之相似。瘘管组的平均住院时间为6.2天,而复发性憩室炎组为4.4天。瘘管组的平均手术时间为220分钟,而无并发症组为176分钟(P < 0.002)。瘘管组的中转开腹率明显更高(25%对5%,P < 0.001)。瘘管组没有术后吻合口漏或出血需要再次手术的情况。
憩室瘘不应再被视为腹腔镜结肠切除术的禁忌证。与单纯复发性憩室炎切除术相比,这些病例更为复杂,手术时间更长且中转开腹率更高就是证明。虽然因憩室瘘接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的患者住院时间更长,但那些腹腔镜手术完成的患者与无并发症疾病患者的结局相同。我们预计,微创手术将成为结肠膀胱瘘的标准治疗方法,就像它现在是单纯憩室病的标准治疗方法一样。