• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术术后程序性卒中的临床反应:德尔福共识研究。

Clinical Response to Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Delphi Consensus Study.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Sep;62(3):350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.033. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.033
PMID:34312072
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

No dedicated studies have been performed on the optimal management of patients with an acute stroke related to carotid intervention nor is there a solid recommendation given in the European Society for Vascular Surgery guideline. By implementation of an international expert Delphi panel, this study aimed to obtain expert consensus on the optimal management of in hospital stroke occurring during or following CEA and to provide a practical treatment decision tree.

METHODS

A four round Delphi consensus study was performed including 31 experts. The aim of the first round was to investigate whether the conceptual model indicating the traditional division between intra- and post-procedural stroke in six phases was appropriate, and to identify relevant clinical responses during these six phases. In rounds 2, 3, and 4, the aim was to obtain consensus on the optimal response to stroke in each predefined setting. Consensus was reached in rounds 1, 3, and 4 when ≥ 70% of experts agreed on the preferred clinical response and in round 2 based on a Likert scale when a median of 7 - 9 (most adequate response) was given, IQR ≤ 2.

RESULTS

The experts agreed (> 80%) on the use of the conceptual model. Stroke laterality and type of anaesthesia were included in the treatment algorithm. Consensus was reached in 17 of 21 scenarios (> 80%). Perform diagnostics first for a contralateral stroke in any phase, and for an ipsilateral stroke during cross clamping, or apparent stroke after leaving the operation room. For an ipsilateral stroke during the wake up phase, no formal consensus was achieved, but 65% of the experts would perform diagnostics first. A CT brain combined with a CTA or duplex ultrasound of the carotid arteries should be performed. For an ipsilateral intra-operative stroke after flow restoration, the carotid artery should be re-explored immediately (75%).

CONCLUSION

In patients having a stroke following carotid endarterectomy, expedited diagnostics should be performed initially in most phases. In patients who experience an ipsilateral intra-operative stroke following carotid clamp release, immediate re-exploration of the index carotid artery is recommended.

摘要

目的

尚无专门研究探讨与颈动脉介入相关的急性卒中患者的最佳治疗方法,欧洲血管外科学会指南也未对此提供确切建议。本研究通过实施国际专家德尔菲小组,旨在就颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)术中或术后发生院内卒中的最佳治疗方法达成专家共识,并提供实用的治疗决策树。

方法

进行了四轮德尔菲共识研究,共纳入 31 名专家。第一轮的目的是研究表明在六个阶段将术中及术后卒中进行传统划分的概念模型是否合适,并确定这六个阶段的相关临床反应。在第二轮、第三轮和第四轮中,目的是确定在每个预设情况下对卒中的最佳反应。在第一轮、第三轮和第四轮中,当≥70%的专家同意首选临床反应时达成共识;在第二轮中,当给出中位数为 7-9(最适当的反应)且 IQR≤2 时基于 Likert 量表达成共识。

结果

专家们(>80%)一致同意使用概念模型。卒中侧和麻醉类型被纳入治疗算法。21 个场景中的 17 个(>80%)达成共识。在任何阶段对对侧卒中,或在夹闭期间对同侧卒中,或在离开手术室后对明显的卒中,应首先进行诊断。对于在苏醒阶段出现的同侧卒中,未达成正式共识,但 65%的专家将首先进行诊断。应进行 CT 脑和 CTA 或颈动脉双功超声检查。对于血流恢复后同侧术中卒中,应立即再次探查颈动脉(75%)。

结论

在颈动脉内膜切除术后发生卒中的患者中,大多数阶段都应首先进行快速诊断。在颈动脉夹闭释放后同侧术中发生卒中的患者中,建议立即再次探查指数颈动脉。

相似文献

1
Clinical Response to Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Delphi Consensus Study.颈动脉内膜切除术术后程序性卒中的临床反应:德尔福共识研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Sep;62(3):350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.033. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
A Delphi Consensus Study on Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy: Patient Reported Outcome Measures.行颈动脉内膜切除术患者报告结局测量的德尔菲共识研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):787-801. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.037. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
3
Immediate and remote results of using carotid endarterectomy and stenting of internal carotid arteries.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈内动脉支架置入术的近期和远期效果。
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2013;19(2):102-10, 93-100.
4
Contralateral Occlusion and Concomitant Procedures Drive Risk of Non-ipsilateral Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后非对侧卒中的风险与对侧闭塞和同时进行的手术相关。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 May;57(5):619-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
5
Characterization of perioperative contralateral stroke after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期对侧卒中的特征描述
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1450-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Carotid endarterectomy should not be based on consensus statement duplex velocity criteria.颈动脉内膜切除术不应基于共识声明中的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):1029-1038.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.028. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后双功超声监测的合理算法。
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Sep;30(3):453-60. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70072-8.
8
Onset of Neurological Deficit During Carotid Clamping With Carotid Endarterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia Is Not a Predictor of Carotid Restenosis.在区域麻醉下行颈动脉内膜切除术并夹闭颈动脉期间出现神经功能缺损并非颈动脉再狭窄的预测指标。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
9
64-detector CT angiography within 24 hours after carotid endarterectomy and correlation with postoperative stroke.颈动脉内膜切除术后24小时内的64层螺旋CT血管造影及与术后中风的相关性
J Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;122(3):637-43. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS132582. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
A Clinical Validation Study of Anatomical Risk Scoring for Procedural Stroke in Patients Treated by Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study.国际颈动脉支架研究中经颈动脉支架置入术治疗的患者中解剖风险评分对操作相关卒中的临床验证研究
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Nov;58(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.035. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Two case descriptions of urgent carotid endarterectomy: the characteristics of thrombosis and stroke at different time points.两例紧急颈动脉内膜切除术的病例描述:不同时间点血栓形成和中风的特征。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Sep 1;14(9):6992-6998. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-422. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Brazilian Angiology and Vascular Surgery Society Guidelines for the treatment of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.巴西血管病学与血管外科学会颅外脑血管疾病治疗指南
J Vasc Bras. 2024 May 31;23:e20230094. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300942. eCollection 2024.