School of Architecture, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, Hunan, China.
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Jul;32(7):2555-2564. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.020.
The identification of ecological sources and corridors plays an important role in the construction of ecological security pattern. However, previous studies mainly concentrated on the optimal path selection of species migration and diffusion rather than the random path selection of the species, which makes most conclusions fail to objectively reveal the process of species migration and diffusion. Taking the downtown area of Hengyang City as an example, we selected the ecological sources and ecological corridors with the habitat quality analysis module of InVEST and Circuitscape 4.0 and evaluated the importance and connectivity of relevant ecological elements with the Linkage Mapper, with the aim to construct the ecological security pattern and delimitate the regions prior to ecological restoration. The results showed that there were 85 ecological sources dominated by woodland and grassland, together with a small number of ponds and beaches, which mainly distributed in the southwest of Zhengxiang District, the west of Yanfeng District, the northeast and south central of Zhuhui District, with a total area of 11.8 km. There were 60 ecological sources with centrality greater than 100, accounting for 70.6% of the total. There were 217 ecological corridors and five potential ecological corridors mainly composed of forest land, among which the proportion of shrubbery and sparse forest land was higher. The corridors with higher importance were mainly distributed in the west of the studied area. After removing the barriers, the regional connectivity had been significantly improved, with the highest extent of 54.9%. The priority areas of ecological restoration were classified into three levels according to the value of cumulative current, namely, the high-grade area, the middle-grade area and the low-grade area. The high-grade area covered 4.3 km of barriers, mainly distributed in the southwest of Zhengxiang District, northeast and south central of Zhuhui District. The middle-grade area was dominated by pinch area and ecological source area with centrality less than 100, covering an area of about 12.9 km, mainly distributed in the central part of Zhengxiang District, northeast and south central of Zhuhui District. The low-level area was mainly distributed in south central of Zhuhui District, with 51.8 km of residual ecological sources. By coupling InVEST habitat quality analysis module and circuit theory, the ecological security pattern for biological protection was constructed, which provides scientific reference for biological protection.
生态源地和廊道的识别在生态安全格局的构建中起着重要作用。然而,以往的研究主要集中在物种迁移和扩散的最优路径选择上,而不是物种的随机路径选择上,这使得大多数结论未能客观地揭示物种迁移和扩散的过程。以衡阳市中心区为例,我们利用 InVEST 的生境质量分析模块和 Circuitscape 4.0 选择了生态源地和生态廊道,并利用 Linkage Mapper 评估了相关生态要素的重要性和连通性,旨在构建生态安全格局,并划定需要进行生态恢复的区域。结果表明,有 85 个以林地和草地为主的生态源地,以及少量的池塘和海滩,主要分布在蒸湘区西南部、雁峰区西部、珠晖区东北部和中南部,总面积为 11.8km。有 60 个中心度大于 100 的生态源地,占总数的 70.6%。有 217 条生态廊道和 5 条主要由林地组成的潜在生态廊道,其中灌丛和疏林地的比例较高。重要性较高的廊道主要分布在研究区西部。去除障碍物后,区域连通性得到了显著改善,连通度最高可达 54.9%。根据累积电流值,将生态恢复的优先区域分为三个等级,即高等级区域、中等级区域和低等级区域。高等级区域覆盖了 4.3km 的障碍物,主要分布在蒸湘区西南部、珠晖区东北部和中南部。中等级区域以中心度小于 100 的夹点区和生态源区为主,面积约 12.9km,主要分布在蒸湘区中部、珠晖区东北部和中南部。低等级区域主要分布在珠晖区中南部,剩余的生态源地面积为 51.8km。通过耦合 InVEST 生境质量分析模块和电路理论,构建了生物保护的生态安全格局,为生物保护提供了科学参考。