• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盲目探索:为边缘型人格障碍心理治疗的非应答预测因素带来曙光。

Searching in the dark: Shining a light on some predictors of non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.

机构信息

Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

School of Education, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0255055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255055. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0255055
PMID:34314461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8315515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a prevalent and serious mental health condition. People can experience recovery or remission after receiving psychotherapy for BPD; however, it is estimated that about 45% of people in well conducted treatment trials do not respond adequately to current psychological treatments.

AIM

To further advance psychotherapies for BPD by identifying the factors that contribute to the problem of non-response.

METHOD

184 consecutive participants with BPD in community treatment were naturalistically followed up over 12 months and measures of personality and social functioning were examined. Logistic regressions were used to determine which baseline factors were associated with the likelihood of being a non-responder after 12 months of psychotherapy. After 12 months, 48.4% of participants were classed as non-responders due to a lack of reduction in BPD symptoms according to the Reliable Change Index (RCI) method.

RESULTS

At baseline intake, patients who endorsed an adult preoccupied attachment relationship style and increased anger were more likely to be a non-responder regarding BPD symptoms at 12 months. In addition, those with preoccupied attachment patterns in their adult relationships were more likely to be non-responders regarding general psychological distress at follow up. Higher baseline levels of paranoia and endorsement of a dismissive adult relationship style was associated with being a non-responder in regard to global functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with previous research, almost half of the sample did not achieve reliable change at 12-month follow up. A relationship style characterised by preoccupied insecurity and high anger seemed to be particularly challenging in being able to benefit from psychotherapy. This style may have affected both relationships outside, but also inside therapy, complicating treatment engagement and alliance with the therapist. Early identification and modification of treatment based on challenges from these relationship styles may be one way to improve psychotherapy outcomes for BPD.

摘要

背景

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种普遍且严重的心理健康状况。人们在接受 BPD 的心理治疗后可以康复或缓解;然而,据估计,在精心设计的治疗试验中,约有 45%的人对当前的心理治疗反应不足。

目的

通过确定导致反应不足问题的因素,进一步推进 BPD 的心理治疗。

方法

对 184 名连续的社区治疗中的 BPD 患者进行自然随访 12 个月,并检查人格和社会功能的测量。使用逻辑回归确定哪些基线因素与 12 个月心理治疗后成为无反应者的可能性相关。12 个月后,根据可靠变化指数(RCI)方法,由于 BPD 症状没有减少,48.4%的参与者被归类为无反应者。

结果

在基线摄入时,那些认同成人占据依恋关系风格和增加愤怒的患者更有可能在 12 个月时成为 BPD 症状的无反应者。此外,在成年期关系中存在占据依恋模式的患者在随访时更有可能在一般心理困扰方面成为无反应者。较高的偏执基线水平和对轻视成年关系风格的认可与在整体功能方面成为无反应者相关。

结论

与之前的研究一致,近一半的样本在 12 个月随访时没有达到可靠的变化。一种以占据性不安全感和高愤怒为特征的关系风格似乎在从心理治疗中获益方面特别具有挑战性。这种风格可能既影响到外部关系,也影响到治疗内部,使治疗参与和与治疗师的联盟变得复杂。根据这些关系风格的挑战,早期识别和修改治疗可能是改善 BPD 心理治疗结果的一种方法。

相似文献

1
Searching in the dark: Shining a light on some predictors of non-response to psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder.盲目探索:为边缘型人格障碍心理治疗的非应答预测因素带来曙光。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0255055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255055. eCollection 2021.
2
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
3
Supervised team management, with or without structured psychotherapy, in heavy users of a mental health service with borderline personality disorder: a two-year follow-up preliminary randomized study.监督团队管理,无论是否结合结构化心理治疗,用于边缘型人格障碍的精神卫生服务重度使用者:一项为期两年的随访初步随机研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 21;11:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-181.
4
Combined therapy with interpersonal psychotherapy adapted for borderline personality disorder: A two-years follow-up.人际心理治疗适应于边缘型人格障碍的联合治疗:两年随访。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jun 30;240:151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
5
Effect of 3 Forms of Early Intervention for Young People With Borderline Personality Disorder: The MOBY Randomized Clinical Trial.《边缘型人格障碍青年三种早期干预方式的效果:MOBY 随机临床试验》。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;79(2):109-119. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3637.
6
Attachment and borderline personality disorder: implications for psychotherapy.依恋与边缘型人格障碍:对心理治疗的启示
Psychopathology. 2005 Mar-Apr;38(2):64-74. doi: 10.1159/000084813. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
7
[Mental health service utilization among borderline personality disorder patients inpatient].[边缘型人格障碍患者住院期间的心理健康服务利用情况]
Encephale. 2015 Apr;41(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
The relationship between self-reported attachment styles, interpersonal dysfunction, and borderline personality disorder.自我报告的依恋风格、人际功能障碍与边缘型人格障碍之间的关系。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Nov;197(11):816-21. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181bea56e.
9
Anger, preoccupied attachment, and domain disorganization in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中的愤怒、过度执着依恋和领域混乱
J Pers Disord. 2009 Jun;23(3):240-57. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.3.240.
10
Impact of Psychotherapy on Psychosocial Functioning in Borderline Personality Disorder Patients.心理治疗对边缘型人格障碍患者心理社会功能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 26;17(12):4610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124610.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomised controlled trial of amygdala fMRI-neurofeedback versus sham-feedback in borderline-personality disorder - systematic literature review and introduction to the BrainSTEADy trial.边缘型人格障碍中杏仁核功能磁共振成像神经反馈与假反馈的随机对照试验——系统文献综述及BrainSTEADy试验介绍
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07000-1.
2
Salivary testosterone and cortisol levels in borderline personality disorder before and after a 12-week group dialectical behavior therapy intervention.边缘型人格障碍患者在接受为期12周的团体辩证行为疗法干预前后的唾液睾酮和皮质醇水平。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1195187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1195187. eCollection 2023.
3
Attachment style of patients diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures at a tertiary Epilepsy Center in the Czech Republic.在捷克共和国一家三级癫痫中心被诊断为精神性非癫痫性发作的患者的依恋风格
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 17;13:1065201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1065201. eCollection 2022.
4
To love and work: A longitudinal study of everyday life factors in recovery from borderline personality disorder.爱与工作:从边缘型人格障碍中恢复的日常生活因素的纵向研究。
Personal Ment Health. 2022 May;16(2):138-154. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1547. Epub 2022 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Impulsiveness in borderline personality disorder predicts the long-term outcome of a psychodynamic treatment programme.边缘型人格障碍中的冲动性可预测心理动力治疗方案的长期效果。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 May;28(3):633-641. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2526. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
2
Coroners' investigations of suicide in Australia: The hidden toll of borderline personality disorder.澳大利亚死因裁判官对自杀事件的调查:边缘型人格障碍的隐性代价。
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Oct;129:241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
3
Improving access to and effectiveness of mental health care for personality disorders: the guideline-informed treatment for personality disorders (GIT-PD) initiative in the Netherlands.改善人格障碍患者获得心理健康护理的机会及护理效果:荷兰人格障碍指南指导治疗(GIT-PD)倡议
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2020 Aug 10;7:16. doi: 10.1186/s40479-020-00133-7. eCollection 2020.
4
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
5
Self-criticism and psychotherapy outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.自我批评与心理治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;75:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101808. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Evaluation of a brief intervention within a stepped care whole of service model for personality disorder.一种基于阶梯式全服务模式的人格障碍简短干预的评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2308-z.
7
A meta-analysis of treatment as usual for borderline personality disorder.一项针对边缘型人格障碍的常规治疗的荟萃分析。
Personal Disord. 2019 Nov;10(6):491-499. doi: 10.1037/per0000353. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a stepped care intervention for personality disorder in mental health services.实施精神卫生服务中人格障碍阶梯式护理干预的障碍和促进因素。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Nov;13(4):230-238. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1467. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
The prevalence of personality disorders in the community: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.社区人群中人格障碍的患病率:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;216(2):69-78. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.166.
10
Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder: Is Supply Adequate to Meet Public Health Needs?边缘型人格障碍的治疗:供应是否足以满足公共卫生需求?
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Sep 1;70(9):772-781. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900073. Epub 2019 May 29.