Rogers J E, Russell M J, Harwell M C
US EPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Ecology Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA.
J Coast Res. 2017 Jul 1;33(4):972-988. doi: 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-16-00077.1.
We report the results for both sequential and simultaneous calibration of exchange flows between segments of a 10-box, 1-dimensional, well mixed, bifurcated tidal mixing model for Tampa Bay. Calibrations were conducted for three model options having different mathematical expressions for evaporative loss. In approaching this project we asked three questions: does simultaneous calibration or sequential calibration yield better box model performance; which evaporation option best predicts observed salinities; and how well does model performance compare to more complex hydrodynamic models. Sequential calibration followed the classical salt balance and steady state approach. The nonlinear parameter estimator (PEST) was used for simultaneous calibration. The sequential approach proved useful in evaluating the three evaporation options. However, simultaneous calibration proved superior in predicting observed salinities but was ineffective in discerning differences between evaporation options. The simultaneously calibrated model produced residence times that fell within the range of more complex hydrodynamic models of Tampa Bay.
我们报告了坦帕湾一个10箱、一维、充分混合、分叉潮汐混合模型各部分之间交换流的序贯校准和同步校准结果。针对蒸发损失具有不同数学表达式的三种模型选项进行了校准。在开展这个项目时,我们提出了三个问题:同步校准还是序贯校准能产生更好的箱式模型性能;哪种蒸发选项能最好地预测观测到的盐度;与更复杂的水动力模型相比,模型性能如何。序贯校准遵循经典的盐平衡和稳态方法。非线性参数估计器(PEST)用于同步校准。序贯方法在评估三种蒸发选项时被证明是有用的。然而,同步校准在预测观测到的盐度方面被证明更优,但在辨别蒸发选项之间的差异方面无效。同步校准模型产生的停留时间落在坦帕湾更复杂水动力模型的范围内。