Lescoat Alain, Murphy Susan L, Roofeh David, Pauling John D, Hughes Michael, Sandler Robert, Zimmermann François, Wessel Rachel, Townsend Whitney, Chung Lorinda, Denton Christopher P, Merkel Peter A, Steen Virginia, Allanore Yannick, Del Galdo Francesco, Godard Dominique, Cella David, Farrington Sue, Buch Maya H, Khanna Dinesh
Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France.
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2021 Feb 1;6(1):66-76. doi: 10.1177/2397198320961967. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc; systemic scleroderma) is characterized by a heterogeneous range of clinical manifestations. SSc is classified into limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous subgroups (dcSSc) based on the extent of skin involvement. Randomized controlled trials in scleroderma have mainly focused on dcSSc partly because the measurement of skin involvement, critical for evaluating a therapeutic intervention is more dynamic in this subset. Nonetheless, lcSSc, the most common cutaneous subset (about 2/3), is also associated with significant morbidity and detrimental impact on health-related quality of life. The lack of interventional studies in lcSSc is partly due to a lack of relevant outcome measures to evaluate this subgroup. Combining several clinically meaningful outcomes selected specifically for lcSSc may improve representativeness in clinical trials and responsiveness of outcomes measured in randomized controlled trials. A composite index dedicated to lcSSc combining such relevant outcomes could advance clinical trial development for lcSSc by providing the opportunity to test and select among candidate drugs that could act as disease-modifying treatments for this neglected subgroup of SSc. This proposed index would include items selected by expert physicians and patients with lcSSc across domains grounded in the lived experience of lcSSc. This article reviews the reasons behind the relative neglect of lcSSc, discusses the current state of outcome measures for lcSSc, identifies challenges, and proposes a roadmap for a combined lcSSc-specific treatment response index.
系统性硬化症(SSc;系统性硬皮病)的临床表现多种多样。根据皮肤受累程度,SSc可分为局限性皮肤型SSc(lcSSc)和弥漫性皮肤型亚组(dcSSc)。硬皮病的随机对照试验主要集中在dcSSc,部分原因是皮肤受累程度的测量对于评估治疗干预至关重要,而在该亚组中这种测量更具动态性。尽管如此,lcSSc是最常见的皮肤亚组(约占2/3),也与显著的发病率以及对健康相关生活质量的不利影响相关。lcSSc缺乏干预性研究部分是由于缺乏评估该亚组的相关结局指标。结合专门为lcSSc选择的几个具有临床意义的结局指标,可能会提高临床试验中的代表性以及随机对照试验中所测量结局指标的反应性。一个专门针对lcSSc的综合指数,通过提供机会在可作为针对这一被忽视的SSc亚组的疾病修饰治疗的候选药物中进行测试和选择,从而推动lcSSc的临床试验发展。这个提议的指数将包括由专家医生和lcSSc患者根据lcSSc的实际生活经验在各个领域中选择的项目。本文回顾了相对忽视lcSSc背后的原因,讨论了lcSSc结局指标的现状,识别了挑战,并提出了一个针对lcSSc的综合治疗反应指数的路线图。