Ozdemir Semra, Ng Sean, Malhotra Chetna, Teo Irene, Finkelstein Eric A
Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Innov Aging. 2021 Jun 14;5(3):igab020. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab020. eCollection 2021.
Many patient-caregiver dyads report conflicting treatment decisions regarding preferences for life extension treatments and symptom management. It is possible that this discordance will lead to negative psychological outcomes including lowered caregiving esteem and increased caregiver burden. However, the relationships between treatment discordance among dyads and caregiver psychological outcomes are not well studied among advanced cancer patients-a gap this study aims to fill.
Outcome variables included caregiver burden and caregiving esteem, measured via a modified 4-domain Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale. The main independent variable was patient-caregiver treatment preference discordance, examined using questions adapted from an existing protocol. Analyses were conducted using multivariable regressions.
A convenience sample of 285 patient-caregiver dyads were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore. The majority (60%) of patient-caregiver dyads reported discordant treatment preferences. Discordance in this study arose because caregivers wanted a balance between life extension and symptom management while patients preferred life-extending treatment. In multivariable analyses, discordance predicted caregiver burden arising from impact on caregiver schedule and health (β = 0.16, = .07) and lack of family support (β = 0.13, = .04).
Theoretically, this study provided a more nuanced understanding of how dyad discordance may worsen the burdens felt by caregivers, and which aspects of their lives (i.e., burden due to impact of caregiver schedule and health and lack of family support) are most affected. Our findings can aid in establishing therapeutic interventions targeted toward improving communication skills and encouraging end-of-life discussions among patients, caregivers, and their health care providers. The importance of establishing and improving therapy programs specifically targeted toward caregivers was also underlined.
许多患者-照护者二元组报告在延长生命治疗和症状管理的偏好方面存在相互冲突的治疗决策。这种不一致有可能导致负面的心理结果,包括照护者自尊降低和照护负担加重。然而,在晚期癌症患者中,二元组之间的治疗不一致与照护者心理结果之间的关系尚未得到充分研究,本研究旨在填补这一空白。
结果变量包括照护者负担和照护者自尊,通过修改后的4领域照护者反应评估量表进行测量。主要自变量是患者-照护者治疗偏好不一致,使用从现有方案改编的问题进行检查。采用多变量回归进行分析。
从新加坡两家三级医院的门诊招募了285个患者-照护者二元组的便利样本。大多数(60%)患者-照护者二元组报告治疗偏好不一致。本研究中的不一致是因为照护者希望在延长生命和症状管理之间取得平衡,而患者更喜欢延长生命的治疗。在多变量分析中,不一致预测了因对照护者日程安排和健康的影响(β = 0.16,P = 0.07)以及缺乏家庭支持(β = 0.13,P = 0.04)而产生的照护者负担。
从理论上讲,本研究更细致地理解了二元组不一致如何可能加重照护者的负担,以及他们生活的哪些方面(即因照护者日程安排和健康的影响以及缺乏家庭支持而产生的负担)受影响最大。我们的研究结果有助于建立针对性的治疗干预措施,以提高沟通技巧,并鼓励患者、照护者及其医疗服务提供者之间进行临终讨论。还强调了建立和改进专门针对照护者的治疗项目的重要性。