Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 May;13(3):531-541. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-496. Epub 2024 May 14.
Greater patient-caregiver concordance for preferred place of death can increase the chances of patients dying at their preferred place, thus improving quality of life at end-of-life (EOL). We aimed to assess changes in and predictors of patient-caregiver concordance in preference for home death at EOL during the last 3 years of life of patients with advanced cancer.
We used data from the Cost of Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness in Singapore (COMPASS) cohort study of patients with stage IV solid cancer. We interviewed patients and their caregivers every 4 months to assess their preference for home death (for patient), and patient (symptom burden, inpatient usage, financial difficulties) and caregiver (psychosocial distress, spiritual wellbeing, competency and perceived lack of family support) characteristics. We used data from patients' last 3 years of life. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regressions to predict dyad concordance for preference for home death.
A total of 227 patient-caregiver dyads were analyzed. More than half of the patient-caregiver dyads observations were concordant in their preference for home death (54%). Concordance for home death declined closer to death (from 68% to 44%). Concordant dyads who preferred home death were less likely to include older patients [relative risk ratio, 0.97; P=0.03]. Dyads who preferred a non-home death (hospital, hospice, nursing home, unsure or others) were more likely to include patients with greater symptom burden (1.08; P=0.007) and with spousal caregivers (2.59; P=0.050), and less likely to include caregivers with greater psychosocial distress (0.90; P=0.003) and higher spiritual wellbeing (0.92; P=0.007).
This study provides evidence of the dynamic changes in preference for home death among patient-caregiver dyads during last 3 years of patients' life. Understanding the EOL needs of older patients, optimizing home-based symptom control and better caregiver support are recommended to increase likelihood of dyad concordance for home death.
患者与照护者在临终时首选的死亡地点越一致,患者在其首选地点去世的可能性就越大,从而提高生命终末期的生活质量。本研究旨在评估晚期癌症患者生命最后 3 年期间,患者与照护者对在家中死亡的偏好是否发生变化,以及哪些因素可以预测这种变化。
我们使用了来自新加坡晚期严重疾病患者医疗费用(COMPASS)队列研究中 IV 期实体瘤患者的数据。我们每 4 个月对患者及其照护者进行一次访谈,以评估他们对在家中死亡的偏好(患者),以及患者(症状负担、住院使用情况、经济困难)和照护者(心理困扰、精神健康、能力和感知到的家庭支持不足)的特征。我们使用了患者生命最后 3 年的数据。我们使用多变量多项逻辑回归来预测对在家中死亡的偏好的双方一致性。
共分析了 227 对患者-照护者。超过一半的患者-照护者观察结果在对在家中死亡的偏好上是一致的(54%)。随着接近死亡,在家中死亡的一致性下降(从 68%降至 44%)。选择在家中死亡的一致的照护者更可能是年龄较小的患者[相对风险比,0.97;P=0.03]。选择非家庭死亡(医院、临终关怀、疗养院、不确定或其他)的照护者更可能是症状负担较大的患者(1.08;P=0.007)和配偶照护者(2.59;P=0.050),而不太可能是心理困扰较大的照护者(0.90;P=0.003)和精神健康较高的照护者(0.92;P=0.007)。
本研究提供了证据表明,在患者生命的最后 3 年期间,患者与照护者对在家中死亡的偏好发生了动态变化。了解老年患者的临终需求,优化基于家庭的症状控制和更好的照护者支持,有助于提高双方在家中死亡的一致性。