Suppr超能文献

单剂量外用非甾体抗炎药(S-氟比洛芬贴剂)对膝骨关节炎患者膝关节症状及运动功能障碍的治疗效果

Treatment Efficacy of Single Topical NSAID (S-Flurbiprofen Plaster) for Knee Symptoms and Locomotive Dysfunction in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients.

作者信息

Sasaki Shizuka, Sasaki Eiji, Kimura Yuka, Naraoka Takuya, Yamamoto Yuji, Tsuda Eiichi, Ishibashi Yasuyuki

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

出版信息

Prog Rehabil Med. 2021 Jul 21;6:20210029. doi: 10.2490/prm.20210029. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of S-flurbiprofen plaster (SFPP) monotherapy for treating knee osteoarthritis compared with the combination of conventional oral and topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

A total of 222 participants (114, SFPP group; 108, control group) were treated for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the degree of pain felt while rising from a chair after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment as determined using the visual analog scale (VAS) . The secondary endpoint was the change in functional scores and test results. Safety was evaluated in terms of the adverse effects.

RESULTS

The VAS score significantly decreased in both groups after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. Non-inferiority in the VAS score was established only at 2 weeks. There were no significant differences in the secondary endpoints between the groups. Skin disorders were more frequent in the SFPP group; however, there was no difference in gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic efficacy of SFPP monotherapy for knee OA, with respect to changes in the VAS, was not shown to be non-inferior to conventional treatment at 4 weeks; however, non-inferiority was established at 2 weeks. The functional improvement in the SFPP group was comparable to that of the control group. No severe GI adverse effects associated with SFPP administration were observed; however, it is necessary to pay more attention to the occurrence of skin disorders with SFPP than with conventional topical NSAIDs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在证明与传统口服和外用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)联合使用相比,S-氟比洛芬贴剂(SFPP)单药治疗膝骨关节炎的非劣效性。

方法

共有222名参与者(114名,SFPP组;108名,对照组)接受了4周的治疗。主要终点是治疗2周和4周后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)确定的从椅子上起身时疼痛程度的变化。次要终点是功能评分和测试结果的变化。根据不良反应评估安全性。

结果

治疗2周和4周后,两组的VAS评分均显著降低。仅在2周时确定VAS评分的非劣效性。两组之间的次要终点没有显著差异。SFPP组皮肤疾病更为常见;然而,胃肠道(GI)不良反应没有差异。

结论

就VAS变化而言,SFPP单药治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效在4周时未显示出不劣于传统治疗;然而,在2周时确定了非劣效性。SFPP组的功能改善与对照组相当。未观察到与SFPP给药相关的严重胃肠道不良反应;然而,与传统外用NSAIDs相比,有必要更加关注SFPP引起的皮肤疾病的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c93/8290354/dfbf4438de47/prm-6-20210029-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验