Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis (CTCIA), Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Center for Treatment Comparison and Integrative Analysis (CTCIA), Division of Rheumatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
OBJECTIVE: To update and expand upon prior Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) guidelines by developing patient-focused treatment recommendations for individuals with Knee, Hip, and Polyarticular osteoarthritis (OA) that are derived from expert consensus and based on objective review of high-quality meta-analytic data. METHODS: We sought evidence for 60 unique interventions. A systematic search of all relevant databases was conducted from inception through July 2018. After abstract and full-text screening by two independent reviewers, eligible studies were matched to PICO questions. Data were extracted and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan software. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence Profiles were compiled using the GRADEpro web application. Voting for Core Treatments took place first. Four subsequent voting sessions took place via anonymous online survey, during which Panel members were tasked with voting to produce recommendations for all joint locations and comorbidity classes. We designated non-Core treatments to Level 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, or 5, based on the percentage of votes in favor, in addition to the strength of the recommendation. RESULTS: Core Treatments for Knee OA included arthritis education and structured land-based exercise programs with or without dietary weight management. Core Treatments for Hip and Polyarticular OA included arthritis education and structured land-based exercise programs. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were strongly recommended for individuals with Knee OA (Level 1A). For individuals with gastrointestinal comorbidities, COX-2 inhibitors were Level 1B and NSAIDs with proton pump inhibitors Level 2. For individuals with cardiovascular comorbidities or frailty, use of any oral NSAID was not recommended. Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids, IA hyaluronic acid, and aquatic exercise were Level 1B/Level 2 treatments for Knee OA, dependent upon comorbidity status, but were not recommended for individuals with Hip or Polyarticular OA. The use of Acetaminophen/Paracetamol (APAP) was conditionally not recommended (Level 4A and 4B), and the use of oral and transdermal opioids was strongly not recommended (Level 5). A treatment algorithm was constructed in order to guide clinical decision-making for a variety of patient profiles, using recommended treatments as input for each decision node. CONCLUSION: These guidelines offer comprehensive and patient-centered treatment profiles for individuals with Knee, Hip, and Polyarticular OA. The treatment algorithm will facilitate individualized treatment decisions regarding the management of OA.
目的:通过制定以患者为中心的治疗建议来更新和扩展先前的骨关节炎研究协会国际(OARSI)指南,这些建议针对膝关节、髋关节和多关节骨关节炎(OA)患者,其来源于专家共识,并基于对高质量荟萃分析数据的客观审查。
方法:我们针对 60 种独特的干预措施寻找证据。从成立之初到 2018 年 7 月,对所有相关数据库进行了系统搜索。经过两位独立评审员的摘要和全文筛选后,符合条件的研究与 PICO 问题相对应。使用 RevMan 软件提取数据并进行荟萃分析。使用 GRADEpro 网络应用程序编制推荐评估、发展和评估(GRADE)证据概况。核心治疗的投票首先进行。随后通过匿名在线调查进行了四次投票会议,在此期间,小组委员的任务是投票为所有关节部位和合并症类别制定建议。我们根据赞成票的百分比以及建议的强度,将非核心治疗指定为 1A、1B、2、3、4A、4B 或 5 级。
结果:膝关节 OA 的核心治疗包括关节炎教育和结构化的基于陆地的运动计划,无论是否进行饮食体重管理。髋关节和多关节 OA 的核心治疗包括关节炎教育和结构化的基于陆地的运动计划。局部非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)强烈推荐用于膝关节 OA 患者(1A 级)。对于有胃肠道合并症的患者,COX-2 抑制剂为 1B 级,质子泵抑制剂联合 NSAIDs 为 2 级。对于有心血管合并症或虚弱的患者,不建议使用任何口服 NSAID。关节内(IA)皮质类固醇、IA 透明质酸和水上运动是膝关节 OA 的 1B/2 级治疗方法,取决于合并症的状态,但不建议用于髋关节或多关节 OA 患者。使用对乙酰氨基酚/扑热息痛(APAP)有条件地不推荐(4A 和 4B 级),口服和透皮阿片类药物强烈不推荐(5 级)。为了指导各种患者群体的临床决策,构建了一个治疗算法,使用推荐的治疗方法作为每个决策节点的输入。
结论:这些指南为膝关节、髋关节和多关节 OA 患者提供了全面的、以患者为中心的治疗方案。治疗算法将有助于针对 OA 管理做出个体化的治疗决策。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019-7-3
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014-3
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020-1-6
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022-3
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013-5-13