Suppr超能文献

羟氯喹啉和氯喹啉治疗新冠肺炎疗效与安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析

Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19.

作者信息

Mittal Niti, Mittal Rakesh, Gupta M C, Kaushal Jyoti, Chugh Ankita, Khera Daisy, Singh Surjit

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

Department of Dentistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Jun;10(6):2126-2139. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2338_20. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

Abstract

Repurposed drugs like hydroxycloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) are being tested for potential therapeutic role in COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of HCQ and CQ in COVID-19. Using PubMed, EMBASE, medRxiv, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, electronic search was carried out to identify relevant articles till June 2020 with re-evaluation in last week of November 2020. Observational and interventional clinical studies comparing efficacy of CQ or HCQ to standard management or other drug/s for SARS-CoV-2 infection patients were included. Cochrane review manager version 5.3 was used for synthesis of meta-analysis results. For randomized controlled trials, risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias assessment tool, version 2.0 (ROB-2). ROBINS-I was used for quality assessment of observational studies. Overall evidence quality generated by review was graded as per GRADE Recommendation. A total of 903 studies were screened. Nineteen studies were included in synthesis of meta-analysis with total of 4,693, 1,626, and 6,491 patients in HCQ/CQ, HCQ/CQ + AZ and control groups, respectively. HCQ/CQ treatment was associated with significantly increased rates of virological cure (OR = 2.08, 95%CI = 1.36-3.17; = 0.0007) and radiological cure (OR = 3.89, 95%CI = 1.35 - 11.23; = 0.01) compared to control. HCQ/CQ had no difference in unadjusted mortality rate (unadjusted OR = 0.98 95% CI = 0.70-1.37, = 0.89, random effect model) and adjusted hazard ratio for mortality (adjusted HR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.86--1.29; = 0.64). However, a significant increase in odds of disease progression (OR = 1.77, 95%CI = 1.46-2.13; < 0.00001) and QT prolongation (OR = 11.15, 95%CI = 3.95-31.44; < 0.00001) was noted. The results with HCQ/CQ and azithromycin combination were similar to HCQ/CQ mono-therapy. In the light of contemporary evidence on effectiveness of HCQ/CQ, judicious and monitored use of HCQ/CQ for treatment of COVID-19 patients is recommended in low to middle income countries with emphasis on no mortality benefit. PROSPERO database: cRD42020187710.

摘要

像羟氯喹(HCQ)和氯喹(CQ)这样的 repurposed 药物正在接受测试,以确定其在 COVID-19 中的潜在治疗作用。我们旨在评估 HCQ 和 CQ 在 COVID-19 中的疗效和安全性。利用 PubMed、EMBASE、medRxiv、谷歌学术、clinicaltrials.gov 进行电子检索,以识别截至 2020 年 6 月的相关文章,并在 2020 年 11 月的最后一周进行重新评估。纳入了比较 CQ 或 HCQ 与标准治疗或其他药物对 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者疗效的观察性和干预性临床研究。使用 Cochrane 综述管理器 5.3 来综合荟萃分析结果。对于随机对照试验,使用 Cochrane 协作偏倚风险评估工具 2.0 版(ROB-2)评估偏倚风险。ROBINS-I 用于观察性研究的质量评估。根据 GRADE 推荐对综述产生的总体证据质量进行分级。共筛选了 903 项研究。19 项研究纳入荟萃分析综合,HCQ/CQ、HCQ/CQ + AZ 和对照组分别有 4693、1626 和 6491 名患者。与对照组相比,HCQ/CQ 治疗与病毒学治愈(OR = 2.08,95%CI = 1.36 - 3.17;P = 0.0007)和影像学治愈(OR = 3.89,95%CI = 1.35 - 11.23;P = 0.01)率显著提高相关。HCQ/CQ 在未调整死亡率(未调整 OR = 0.98,95%CI = 0.70 - 1.37,P = 0.89,随机效应模型)和调整后的死亡风险比(调整后 HR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.86 - 1.29;P = 0.64)方面没有差异。然而,注意到疾病进展的几率(OR = 1.77,95%CI = 1.46 - 2.13;P < 0.00001)和 QT 延长(OR = 11.15,95%CI = 3.95 - 31.44;P < 0.00001)显著增加。HCQ/CQ 与阿奇霉素联合使用的结果与 HCQ/CQ 单药治疗相似。鉴于关于 HCQ/CQ 有效性的当代证据,建议在低收入和中等收入国家谨慎且有监测地使用 HCQ/CQ 治疗 COVID-19 患者,重点是无死亡率益处。PROSPERO 数据库:cRD42020187710 。 (注:文中“repurposed drugs”不太明确准确中文表述,暂直译为“repurposed 药物” )

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d350/8284216/0ae7ea35afff/JFMPC-10-2126-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验