Trachuk Polina, Hemmige Vagish, Eisenberg Ruth, Cowman Kelsie, Chen Victor, Weston Gregory, Gendlina Inessa, Ferguson Nadia, Dicpinigaitis Peter, Berger Jay, Pirofski Liise-Anne, Sarwar Uzma N
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 15;8(7):ofab182. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab182. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Infection is a leading cause of admission to intensive care units (ICUs), with critically ill patients often receiving empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics. Nevertheless, a dedicated infectious diseases (ID) consultation and stewardship team is not routinely established. An ID-critical care medicine (ID-CCM) pilot program was designed at a 400-bed tertiary care hospital in which an ID attending was assigned to participate in daily rounds with the ICU team, as well as provide ID consultation on select patients. We sought to evaluate the impact of this dedicated ID program on antibiotic utilization and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU.
In this single-site retrospective study, we analyzed antibiotic utilization and clinical outcomes in patients admitted to an ICU during the postintervention period from January 1 to December 31, 2017, and compared it to antibiotic utilization in the same ICUs during the preintervention period from January 1 to December 31, 2015.
Our data showed a statistically significant reduction in usage of most frequently prescribed antibiotics including vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefepime during the intervention period. When compared to the preintervention period there was no difference in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, and readmission.
With this multidisciplinary intervention, we saw a decrease in the use of the most frequently prescribed broad-spectrum antibiotics without a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Our study shows that the implementation of an ID-CCM service is a feasible way to promote antibiotic stewardship in the ICU and can be used as a strategy to reduce unnecessary patient exposure to broad-spectrum agents.
感染是重症监护病房(ICU)收治患者的主要原因,重症患者常接受经验性广谱抗生素治疗。然而,专门的传染病(ID)会诊及管理团队并非常规设立。在一家拥有400张床位的三级医院设计了一项ID-重症医学(ID-CCM)试点项目,其中安排一名ID主治医师参与ICU团队的日常查房,并为特定患者提供ID会诊。我们旨在评估这一专门的ID项目对入住ICU患者抗生素使用及临床结局的影响。
在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们分析了2017年1月1日至12月31日干预期入住ICU患者的抗生素使用情况及临床结局,并将其与2015年1月1日至12月31日同一ICU在干预前期的抗生素使用情况进行比较。
我们的数据显示,在干预期,包括万古霉素、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和头孢吡肟在内的最常用抗生素的使用量在统计学上有显著减少。与干预前期相比,住院死亡率、住院时间和再入院率没有差异。
通过这种多学科干预,我们发现最常用的广谱抗生素使用量有所减少,且对临床结局没有负面影响。我们的研究表明,实施ID-CCM服务是促进ICU抗生素管理的一种可行方法,可作为减少患者不必要接触广谱药物的一种策略。