Zhang Yu-Zhi, Singh Suveer
Yu-Zhi Zhang, Suveer Singh, Departments of Intensive Care and Respiratory Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom.
World J Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 4;4(1):13-28. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v4.i1.13.
Antibiotic usage and increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) mount significant challenges to patient safety and management of the critically ill on intensive care units (ICU). Antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) aim to optimise appropriate antibiotic treatment whilst minimising antibiotic resistance. Different models of ASP in intensive care setting, include "standard" control of antibiotic prescribing such as "de-escalation strategies"through to interventional approaches utilising biomarker-guided antibiotic prescribing. A systematic review of outcomes related studies for ASPs in an ICU setting was conducted. Forty three studies were identified from MEDLINE between 1996 and 2014. Of 34 non-protocolised studies, [1 randomised control trial (RCT), 22 observational and 11 case series], 29 (85%) were positive with respect to one or more outcome: These were the key outcome of reduced antibiotic use, or ICU length of stay, antibiotic resistance, or prescribing cost burden. Limitations of non-standard antibiotic initiation triggers, patient and antibiotic selection bias or baseline demographic variance were identified. All 9 protocolised studies were RCTs, of which 8 were procalcitonin (PCT) guided antibiotic stop/start interventions. Five studies addressed antibiotic escalation, 3 de-escalation and 1 addressed both. Six studies reported positive outcomes for reduced antibiotic use, ICU length of stay or antibiotic resistance. PCT based ASPs are effective as antibiotic-stop (de-escalation) triggers, but not as an escalation trigger alone. PCT has also been effective in reducing antibiotic usage without worsening morbidity or mortality in ventilator associated pulmonary infection. No study has demonstrated survival benefit of ASP. Ongoing challenges to infectious disease management, reported by the World Health Organisation global report 2014, are high AMR to newer antibiotics, and regional knowledge gaps in AMR surveillance. Improved AMR surveillance data, identifying core aspects of successful ASPs that are transferable, and further well-conducted trials will be necessary if ASPs are to be an effective platform for delivering desired patient outcomes and safety through best antibiotic policy.
抗生素的使用以及日益增加的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)给重症监护病房(ICU)患者的安全和重症患者的管理带来了重大挑战。抗生素管理计划(ASP)旨在优化抗生素的合理使用,同时尽量减少抗生素耐药性。重症监护环境中不同模式的ASP,包括对抗生素处方的“标准”控制,如通过“降阶梯策略”,到利用生物标志物指导抗生素处方的干预方法。对ICU环境中与ASP相关研究的结果进行了系统评价。从1996年至2014年的MEDLINE中检索到43项研究。在34项非标准化研究中,[1项随机对照试验(RCT)、22项观察性研究和11项病例系列研究],29项(85%)在一个或多个结果方面呈阳性:这些关键结果包括抗生素使用减少、ICU住院时间缩短、抗生素耐药性降低或处方成本负担减轻。发现了非标准抗生素起始触发因素、患者和抗生素选择偏倚或基线人口统计学差异等局限性。所有9项标准化研究均为RCT,其中8项是降钙素原(PCT)指导的抗生素停用/起始干预。5项研究涉及抗生素升级,3项涉及降阶梯,1项两者均涉及。6项研究报告了在减少抗生素使用、ICU住院时间或抗生素耐药性方面的积极结果。基于PCT的ASP作为抗生素停用(降阶梯)触发因素是有效的,但不能单独作为升级触发因素。PCT在减少抗生素使用方面也很有效,且不会增加呼吸机相关性肺炎的发病率或死亡率。没有研究证明ASP对生存有益。世界卫生组织《2014年全球报告》报告的传染病管理方面持续存在的挑战包括对新型抗生素的高AMR以及AMR监测方面的区域知识差距。如果ASP要成为通过最佳抗生素政策实现预期患者结果和安全的有效平台,就需要改进AMR监测数据,确定成功的ASP中可转移的核心方面,并进行进一步的高质量试验。