• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良活动评估量表最小临床重要差异的验证。

Validation of the minimal clinically important difference for modified activities assessment scale.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States; Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-Based Practice, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States.

Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States; Center for Surgical Trials and Evidence-Based Practice, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):770-773. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.042. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.042
PMID:34325909
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in patient-derived scores that is clinically important. We sought to validate the MCID of the modified activities assessment scale (mAAS).

METHODS

Patients were surveyed prior to undergoing abdomen/pelvis CT scans and resurveyed one year later. Before resurvey, patients were asked if they had no change, worsening, or improvement in AW-QOL. The anchor-based MCID was calculated by taking a weighted mean of the difference between control (no change) and study (worsening/improved) groups. Distribution-based approach was calculated by one-half of the standard deviation in the QOL change.

RESULTS

52.8% of 181 patients self-reported no change, 39.2% reported improvement, and 8.3% reported worsening AW-QOL. The anchor-based approach MCID was 4. The distribution-based MCID was 16.

CONCLUSION

Our study results validate prior work demonstrating similar ranges of the mAAS MCID. We recommend adopting an MCID of 5 and 15 for AW-QOL with mAAS.

摘要

背景

最小临床重要差异(MCID)是指患者评分变化中最能体现临床重要性的最小变化。我们旨在验证改良活动评估量表(mAAS)的 MCID。

方法

患者在接受腹部/骨盆 CT 扫描前接受调查,并在一年后进行随访。在再次调查之前,患者被问到 AW-QOL 是否没有变化、恶化或改善。基于锚定的 MCID 通过取对照组(无变化)和研究组(恶化/改善)之间差异的加权平均值来计算。基于分布的方法通过 QOL 变化的标准差的一半来计算。

结果

181 名患者中有 52.8%报告 AW-QOL 无变化,39.2%报告改善,8.3%报告恶化。基于锚定的 MCID 为 4。基于分布的 MCID 为 16。

结论

我们的研究结果验证了先前的工作,表明 mAAS 的 MCID 范围相似。我们建议采用 mAAS 的 AW-QOL 的 MCID 为 5 和 15。

相似文献

1
Validation of the minimal clinically important difference for modified activities assessment scale.改良活动评估量表最小临床重要差异的验证。
Am J Surg. 2022 Apr;223(4):770-773. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.042. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
2
Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and brief pain inventory in patients undergoing re-irradiation for painful bone metastases.EORTC QLQ-C30 和简短疼痛量表在因骨转移疼痛行再放疗患者中的最小临床重要差异。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Apr;27(4):1089-1098. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1745-8. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL modules in patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy.接受姑息性放疗的骨转移患者中,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷QLQ-BM22和QLQ-C15-PAL模块的最小临床重要差异
Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2535-2541. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1308-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
4
Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the PEmbQoL questionnaire, a measure of pulmonary embolism-specific quality of life.确定 PEmbQoL 问卷的最小临床重要差异,该问卷是一种测量肺栓塞特异性生活质量的工具。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;16(12):2454-2461. doi: 10.1111/jth.14302. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Evaluating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire in a Multicenter Prospective Study.在一项多中心前瞻性研究中评估国王结节病问卷的最小临床重要差异。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Mar;18(3):477-485. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-607OC.
6
Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life.腹壁疝及其修复对患者生活质量的影响。
World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):19-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4173-6.
7
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12.前颅底鼻腔量表-12 的最小临床重要差异。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Aug 1;83(2):277-280. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx401.
8
Estimating minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis.估算囊性纤维化胃肠道症状的最小临床重要差异 (MCID)。
J Cyst Fibros. 2024 Sep;23(5):991-999. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
The minimal clinically important difference of the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme.南安普敦掌腱膜挛缩评分方案的最小临床重要差异。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):539-544. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2023.2172024. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
10
What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?全膝关节置换术后 WOMAC 指数的最小临床重要差异是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2005-2014. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000444.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel One-Stop Multidisciplinary Clinic for Chronic Postoperative Inguinal Pain: Initial Experiences and Outcomes.一种新型的慢性术后腹股沟疼痛一站式多学科诊所:初步经验与结果
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jun 16;4:14317. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14317. eCollection 2025.
2
Synthetic Versus Biologic Mesh for Complex Open Ventral Hernia Repair: 3-Year Follow-Up of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.用于复杂开放性腹疝修补的合成材料与生物补片:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的3年随访
HCA Healthc J Med. 2025 Feb 1;6(1):43-50. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1761. eCollection 2025.
3
Hernia Prevention Using Biologic Mesh and/or Small Bites: A Multispecialty 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.
生物补片和/或小切口预防疝:一项多学科 2×2 析因随机对照试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Aug 1;237(2):309-317. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000705. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Impact of disclosure of radiographic test results on quality of life among patients with hernias: a randomized controlled trial.疝患者放射学检查结果披露对生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):411-418. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02824-w. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
5
Natural history of occult hernias in adults at a safety-net hospital.成人隐匿疝在一家保障性医院的自然病史。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1467-1472. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02754-7. Epub 2023 Feb 16.