Bergström Liza, Cichero Julie Ay
Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, Department of Health & Rehabilitation, Speech and Language Pathology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 405 30, Sweden.
Speech Therapy Clinic, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Feb;24(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2021.1953592. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
: Cervical auscultation (CA) uses a stethoscope or microphone to complement the clinical swallow examination by interpreting swallowing sounds and swallow-respiratory coordination. This study investigated the effects of structured CA training on CA-rating agreement with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and CA rater reliability.: Thirty-nine speech-language pathologists participated in a structured CA training course at Gothenburg University. They rated nine swallow-respiratory sound recordings which were simultaneously recorded during FEES. Swallow sounds were rated six weeks prior to the CA-workshop using two binary yes/no questions, (1) , (2) , and a third rating. Swallow sounds were rated again (re-randomised) one month post CA-workshop.: Agreement with FEES (validity) improved significantly ( < 0.05) pre-post training for the Safe and Dysphagia questions, with post training sensitivities >90% and specificities at 76% and 85% respectively. Dysphagia severity rating improved non-significantly. Intra-rater reliability improved significantly with kappa statistics >0.90 post training. Improvements for inter-rater reliability were noted, though non-significant.: Results demonstrate that with structured training, the validity of CA (to detect a Safe/Dysphagic swallow) significantly improves, as does intra-rater reliability. This is congruent with literature identifying the positive effects of structured training improving instrumental dysphagia assessment.
颈部听诊(CA)通过使用听诊器或麦克风来解读吞咽声音和吞咽 - 呼吸协调性,以辅助临床吞咽检查。本研究调查了结构化CA培训对CA评级与吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估(FEES)之间一致性以及CA评分者可靠性的影响。
39名言语病理学家参加了哥德堡大学举办的结构化CA培训课程。他们对在FEES过程中同时录制的9段吞咽 - 呼吸声音记录进行评分。在CA工作坊前六周,使用两个二元是/否问题(1) ,(2) 以及第三个等级评定对吞咽声音进行评分。在CA工作坊后一个月再次对吞咽声音进行评分(重新随机化)。
对于“安全”和“吞咽困难”问题,培训前后与FEES的一致性(有效性)有显著提高(<0.05),培训后敏感性>90%,特异性分别为76%和85%。吞咽困难严重程度评分无显著改善。评分者内部可靠性在培训后通过kappa统计显著提高,kappa值>0.90。评分者间可靠性有改善,但不显著。
结果表明,通过结构化培训,CA(检测安全/吞咽困难吞咽)的有效性显著提高,评分者内部可靠性也显著提高。这与文献中关于结构化培训对改善吞咽困难仪器评估有积极作用的观点一致。