Stroud A E, Lawrie B W, Wiles C M
Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Sep;16(6):640-5. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr533oa.
To measure the inter- and intra-rater reliability of cervical auscultation used alone to detect aspiration in dysphagic patients.
A university teaching hospital.
Comparison of the detection of aspiration in 16 recorded swallow sounds by five speech and language therapists on two occasions. Swallow sounds were recorded simultaneously with videofluoroscopy.
Sixteen patients referred for assessment of dysphagia with videofluoroscopy.
The kappa statistic for multiple raters showed fair agreement between raters (kappa = 0.28). There was high agreement when aspiration occurred but in non-aspirating swallows there was significant overdetection of aspiration (p < 0.001 McNemar's test). The intra-rater reliability within different individuals was widely variable (kappa = 0.55 (range 0.31-0.85)).
Presented with the swallowing sounds in isolation speech and language therapists cannot reliably classify swallows into those with accompanying aspiration and those without. There appears to be a problem of over detection of aspiration. Even in this small study, however, some individual therapists achieve such high reliability (kappa = 0.85) that they must be using successful internal criteria to interpret the swallow sounds correctly and further qualitative research may identify these.
测量单独使用颈部听诊检测吞咽困难患者误吸的评分者间和评分者内信度。
一所大学教学医院。
5名言语治疗师在两个时间点对16份记录的吞咽声音进行误吸检测比较。吞咽声音与电视荧光吞咽造影同时记录。
16名因吞咽困难接受电视荧光吞咽造影评估的患者。
多评分者的kappa统计显示评分者间一致性一般(kappa = 0.28)。发生误吸时一致性较高,但在无误吸的吞咽中存在误吸过度检测(McNemar检验,p < 0.001)。不同个体内评分者信度差异很大(kappa = 0.55(范围0.31 - 0.85))。
仅根据吞咽声音,言语治疗师无法可靠地将吞咽分为伴有误吸和无误吸两类。存在误吸过度检测的问题。然而,即使在这项小型研究中,一些个体治疗师也能达到如此高的信度(kappa = 0.85),以至于他们一定是使用了成功的内部标准来正确解读吞咽声音,进一步的定性研究可能会确定这些标准。