Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun-Yat Sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun-Yat Sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC; Aeroaol Science Research Center, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 1;793:148574. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148574. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
This study inter-compared the concentration and chemical characteristics of PM at two harbors in East Asia, and identified the potential sources of PM and their contribution. Two sites located at the Kaohsiung (Taiwan) and Manila (the Philippines) Harbors were selected for simultaneous sampling of PM in four seasons. The sampling of 24-h PM was conducted for continuous seven days in each season. Water-soluble ions, metallic elements, carbonaceous content, anhydrosugars, and organic acids in PM were analyzed to characterize their chemical fingerprints. Receptor modeling and trajectory simulation were further applied to resolve the source apportionment of PM. The results indicated that the Kaohsiung Harbor was highly influenced by long-range transport (LRT) of polluted air masses from Northeast Asia, while the Manila Harbor was mainly influenced by local emissions. Secondary inorganic aerosols were the most abundant ions in PM. Crustal elements dominated the metallic content of PM, but trace elements were mainly originated from anthropogenic sources. Higher concentrations of organic carbon (OC) than elemental carbon (EC) was found in PM, with secondary OC (SOC) dominant to the former. Levoglucosan in PM at the Manila Harbor were superior to those at the Kaohsiung Harbor due to biomass burning surrounding the Manila Harbor. Additionally, high mass ratios of malonic and succinic acids (M/S) in PM indicated the formation of SOAs. Overall, the ambient air quality of Manila Harbor was more polluted than Kaohsiung Harbor. The Kaohsiung Harbor was more severely affected by LRT of polluted air masses from Northeast Asia, while those toward the Manila Harbor came from the oceans. The major sources resolved by CMB and PMF models at the Kaohsiung Harbor were secondary aerosols, ironworks, incinerators, oceanic spray, and ship emissions, while those at the Manila Harbor were secondary aerosols, soil dust, biomass burning, ship emissions, and oceanic spray.
本研究对比了东亚两个港口的 PM 浓度和化学特征,并确定了 PM 的潜在来源及其贡献。选择高雄(台湾)和马尼拉(菲律宾)两个港口的两个站点,在四个季节同时对 PM 进行采样。每个季节连续七天进行 24 小时 PM 采样。分析 PM 中的水溶性离子、金属元素、碳含量、无水糖和有机酸,以表征其化学特征。进一步应用受体模型和轨迹模拟来解析 PM 的源分配。结果表明,高雄港受来自东北亚的污染空气长程传输(LRT)的影响较大,而马尼拉港主要受本地排放的影响。二次无机气溶胶是 PM 中最丰富的离子。地壳元素主导 PM 中的金属含量,但微量元素主要来源于人为源。PM 中有机碳(OC)的浓度高于元素碳(EC),其中二次有机碳(SOC)占主导地位。马尼拉港 PM 中的左旋葡聚糖高于高雄港,这是由于马尼拉港周围生物质燃烧的影响。此外,PM 中丙二酸和琥珀酸的高质量比(M/S)表明 SOA 的形成。总体而言,马尼拉港的空气质量比高雄港污染更为严重。高雄港受来自东北亚的污染空气长程传输的影响更为严重,而马尼拉港的污染空气则来自海洋。CMB 和 PMF 模型在高雄港解析的主要来源是二次气溶胶、钢铁厂、焚烧炉、海洋喷雾和船舶排放,而在马尼拉港则是二次气溶胶、土壤尘埃、生物质燃烧、船舶排放和海洋喷雾。