Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0253945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253945. eCollection 2021.
Musculoskeletal pain affects approximately 20% of the population worldwide and represents one of the leading causes of global disability. As yet, precise mechanisms underlying the development of musculoskeletal pain and transition to chronicity remain unclear, though individual factors such as sleep quality, physical activity, affective state, pain catastrophizing and psychophysical pain sensitivity have all been suggested to be involved. This study aimed to investigate whether factors at baseline could predict musculoskeletal pain intensity to an experimental delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS) pain model. Demographics, physical activity, pain catastrophizing, affective state, sleep quality, isometric force production, temporal summation of pain, and psychophysical pain sensitivity using handheld and cuff algometry were assessed at baseline (Day-0) and two days after (Day-2) in 28 healthy participants. DOMS was induced on Day-0 by completing eccentric calf raises on the non-dominant leg to fatigue. On Day-2, participants rated pain on muscle contraction (visual analogue scale, VAS, 0-10cm) and function (Likert scale, 0-6). DOMS resulted in non-dominant calf pain at Day-2 (3.0±2.3cm), with significantly reduced isometric force production (P<0.043) and handheld pressure pain thresholds (P<0.010) at Day-2 compared to Day-0. Linear regression models using backward selection predicted from 39.3% (P<0.003) of VAS to 57.7% (P<0.001) of Likert score variation in DOMS pain intensity and consistently included cuff pressure pain tolerance threshold (P<0.01), temporal summation of pain (P<0.04), and age (P<0.02) as independent predictive factors. The findings indicate that age, psychological and central pain mechanistic factors are consistently associated with pain following acute muscle injury.
肌肉骨骼疼痛影响全球约 20%的人口,是全球残疾的主要原因之一。然而,肌肉骨骼疼痛的发展和向慢性疼痛转变的确切机制尚不清楚,尽管有人提出个体因素,如睡眠质量、身体活动、情绪状态、疼痛灾难化和心理物理疼痛敏感性,都可能与之相关。本研究旨在探讨基线时的因素是否可以预测肌肉骨骼疼痛强度,以建立延迟性肌肉酸痛(DOMS)疼痛模型。在 28 名健康参与者中,分别在基线(第 0 天)和两天后(第 2 天)评估了人口统计学资料、身体活动、疼痛灾难化、情绪状态、睡眠质量、等长力产生、疼痛时间总和以及使用手持式和袖带压痛测量法的心理物理疼痛敏感性。在第 0 天,通过在非优势腿上进行离心小腿抬高至疲劳来诱导 DOMS。在第 2 天,参与者根据肌肉收缩(视觉模拟量表,VAS,0-10cm)和功能(Likert 量表,0-6)对疼痛进行评分。第 2 天,非优势侧小腿疼痛(3.0±2.3cm),与第 0 天相比,第 2 天等长力产生显著降低(P<0.043),手持式压痛阈值(P<0.010)降低。使用向后选择的线性回归模型预测,VAS 评分的 39.3%(P<0.003)至 Likert 评分的 57.7%(P<0.001)的 DOMS 疼痛强度变化可由袖带压痛耐受阈值(P<0.01)、疼痛时间总和(P<0.04)和年龄(P<0.02)作为独立预测因子进行预测。研究结果表明,年龄、心理和中枢疼痛机制因素与急性肌肉损伤后的疼痛始终相关。