Laboratory for Paleoclimatology & Climatology, Department of Geography, Environment & Geomatics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario Canada.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0254257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254257. eCollection 2021.
Griffiths et al. (2017) analyzed several ponds and lakes from the Cape Herschel region of Ellesmere Island in order to "…explicitly examine the role of ice cover as the dominant driver of diatom assemblage change…". I reanalyze their data and suggest that their classification scheme, that they propose is due to differences in ice cover seasonality ("warm", "cool", "cold", and "oasis"), is confounded with other morphological and chemical variables that better explain the differences between the groups. The "cold" sites are the deepest (lakes) and differ from the small, shallow ponds that occasionally dry, which would therefore have different diatom assemblages and histories. The "oasis" sites are nutrient enriched and probably have more stable water supplies, thereby enabling an aquatic flora providing habitats for diatoms. A key part of their interpretation is that "warm" sites have responded more rapidly to recent climate change than "cold" or "cool" sites, but their chronologies do not allow for such a conclusion. There is no clear difference between "cool" and "warm" sites, and problems in dating the sequences means inferences about their histories are not supported by data. Their results, which are restricted to the past century, are contradicted by a Holocene sequence from the region.
格里菲斯等人(2017 年)分析了埃尔斯米尔岛赫歇尔角地区的几个池塘和湖泊,目的是“……明确考察冰盖作为硅藻组合变化的主要驱动因素的作用……”。我重新分析了他们的数据,并提出他们提出的分类方案,即由于冰盖季节性(“温暖”、“凉爽”、“寒冷”和“绿洲”)的差异,与更好地解释组间差异的其他形态和化学变量混淆。“寒冷”的地点是最深的(湖泊),与偶尔干涸的小而浅的池塘不同,因此具有不同的硅藻组合和历史。“绿洲”地点富含有机物,可能有更稳定的水源,从而为提供硅藻栖息地的水生植物提供了条件。他们解释的一个关键部分是,“温暖”地点比“寒冷”或“凉爽”地点对最近的气候变化反应更快,但他们的年代序列不允许得出这样的结论。“凉爽”和“温暖”地点之间没有明显区别,而且序列的年代问题意味着关于它们历史的推断没有得到数据的支持。他们的结果仅限于过去一个世纪,与该地区全新世序列相矛盾。