• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度认知障碍个体参与认知刺激活动:与神经心理学领域和海马体体积的关系。

Engagement in cognitively stimulating activities in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: relationships with neuropsychological domains and hippocampal volume.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Healthy Brain Ageing Program, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022 Nov;29(6):1000-1021. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.1955822. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1080/13825585.2021.1955822
PMID:34330189
Abstract

Late-life participation in cognitively stimulating activities is thought to contribute to an individual's cognitive reserve and thus protect against cognitive decline, yet its association with clinical markers of neurodegeneration is not well established. To investigate, we developed a 13-item self-report "cognitively stimulating activities" questionnaire (CSA-Q), which was completed by a community sample of 269 older adults (>50 years) at risk of dementia. Participants met criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and were classified as amnestic (aMCI; = 93) or non-amnestic (naMCI; = 176). Weighted CSA-Q dimensions were calculated for activity and via a panel of 23 inter-raters. The CSA-Q mean and its dimensions were examined in relation to: (a) demographics (age, sex), (b) cognitive reserve proxies (years of education, premorbid IQ), (c) neuropsychological markers across cognitive domains of executive function, processing speed, learning, and memory storage, and (d) neuroimaging markers (left and right hippocampal volume). Analyses were conducted for all MCI, as well as for aMCI and naMCI sub-types. The CSA-Q was found to have concurrent validity with cognitive reserve proxies. Among all MCI, the CSA-Q dimensions of intensity and mental engagement had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume, but not with neuropsychological performance. For naMCI, the CSA-Q had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume, and small associations with aspects of executive functioning and processing speed. No equivalent associations emerged for the aMCI subtype. Our findings show that the CSA-Q may be particularly useful for older adults with non-amnestic cognitive deficits.

摘要

晚年参与认知刺激活动被认为有助于个体的认知储备,从而预防认知能力下降,但它与神经退行性变的临床标志物的关联尚未得到很好的确定。为了研究这一点,我们开发了一个 13 项的自我报告“认知刺激活动”问卷(CSA-Q),该问卷由 269 名有痴呆风险的社区老年人(>50 岁)完成。参与者符合轻度认知障碍(MCI)的标准,并被分类为遗忘型(aMCI;n=93)或非遗忘型(naMCI;n=176)。通过 23 名评分者小组,为活动 和 计算加权 CSA-Q 维度。检查 CSA-Q 平均值及其维度与:(a)人口统计学(年龄、性别),(b)认知储备代理(受教育年限、学前智商),(c)执行功能、处理速度、学习和记忆存储等认知领域的神经心理学标志物,以及(d)神经影像学标志物(左、右海马体积)的关系。对所有 MCI 以及 aMCI 和 naMCI 亚型进行了分析。CSA-Q 与认知储备代理具有同时效度。在所有 MCI 中,CSA-Q 的强度和心理投入维度与左海马体积中度相关,但与神经心理学表现无关。对于 naMCI,CSA-Q 与左海马体积中度相关,与执行功能和处理速度的某些方面也有中度相关。在 aMCI 亚型中没有出现等效的关联。我们的研究结果表明,CSA-Q 对于非遗忘型认知缺陷的老年人可能特别有用。

相似文献

1
Engagement in cognitively stimulating activities in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: relationships with neuropsychological domains and hippocampal volume.轻度认知障碍个体参与认知刺激活动:与神经心理学领域和海马体体积的关系。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022 Nov;29(6):1000-1021. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.1955822. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
Clinical relevance of amnestic versus non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment subtyping in Parkinson's disease.遗忘型与非遗忘型轻度认知障碍亚组在帕金森病中的临床相关性。
Eur J Neurol. 2019 May;26(5):766-773. doi: 10.1111/ene.13886. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
3
Predictors of independence in instrumental activities of daily living: Amnestic versus nonamnestic MCI.日常生活工具性活动独立性的预测因素:遗忘型与非遗忘型轻度认知障碍
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Nov;38(9):991-1004. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1181716. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
Hippocampal Volumes in Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Types Using Two Common Methods of MCI Classification.使用两种常见的 MCI 分类方法评估遗忘型和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍类型的海马体积。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022 Apr;28(4):391-400. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721000564. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
Analysis of verbal fluency ability in amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment.遗忘型和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍的言语流畅性能力分析。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013 Nov;28(7):721-31. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act058. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
6
Association Between Olfactory Dysfunction and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease Dementia.嗅觉功能障碍与遗忘型轻度认知障碍及阿尔茨海默病性痴呆之间的关联
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Jan;73(1):93-101. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2952.
7
Autonomic function in amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment: spectral heart rate variability analysis provides evidence for a brain-heart axis.遗忘型和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍的自主神经功能:心率变异性谱分析为脑心轴提供证据。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 15;10(1):11661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68131-x.
8
Brain metabolism and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers profile of non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment in comparison to amnestic mild cognitive impairment and normal older subjects.与遗忘型轻度认知障碍及正常老年受试者相比,非遗忘型轻度认知障碍的脑代谢和脑脊液生物标志物特征
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Sep 15;7(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0143-0.
9
Relationship between cognitive reserve, brain volume, and neuropsychological performance in amnestic and nonamnestic MCI.遗忘型和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍中认知储备、脑容量与神经心理学表现之间的关系。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2023 Sep-Nov;30(6):940-956. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2022.2161462. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
Olfactory identification in amnestic and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment and its neuropsychological correlates.遗忘型和非遗忘型轻度认知障碍的嗅觉识别及其神经心理学相关性。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Feb 15;349(1-2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
[Effects of a personalised, adapted computerised cognitive stimulation programme versus stimulating leisure activities in younger and older adults with mild or subjective cognitive impairment. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial].[个性化、适应性计算机认知刺激计划与刺激性休闲活动对轻度或主观认知障碍的年轻人和老年人的影响。一项随机对照试验的方案]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2025 Apr 30;48(1):e1118. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.1118.
2
The relationship between dementia staging scales, cognitive-behavioral scales and functionality in patients with cognitive impairment.认知障碍患者的痴呆分期量表、认知行为量表与功能之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 May 2;20(5):e0322572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322572. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of fully immersive virtual reality training on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
完全沉浸式虚拟现实训练对轻度认知障碍患者认知功能的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Dec 6;18:1467697. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1467697. eCollection 2024.
4
Leisure Activity Variety and Brain Volume Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Analysis of the Neuron to Environmental Impact Across Generations Study Data.社区居住的老年人的休闲活动多样性与脑容量:对跨代神经元对环境影响研究数据的分析
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Nov 30;13:758562. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.758562. eCollection 2021.