Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Healthy Brain Ageing Program, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Australia.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022 Nov;29(6):1000-1021. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.1955822. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
Late-life participation in cognitively stimulating activities is thought to contribute to an individual's cognitive reserve and thus protect against cognitive decline, yet its association with clinical markers of neurodegeneration is not well established. To investigate, we developed a 13-item self-report "cognitively stimulating activities" questionnaire (CSA-Q), which was completed by a community sample of 269 older adults (>50 years) at risk of dementia. Participants met criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and were classified as amnestic (aMCI; = 93) or non-amnestic (naMCI; = 176). Weighted CSA-Q dimensions were calculated for activity and via a panel of 23 inter-raters. The CSA-Q mean and its dimensions were examined in relation to: (a) demographics (age, sex), (b) cognitive reserve proxies (years of education, premorbid IQ), (c) neuropsychological markers across cognitive domains of executive function, processing speed, learning, and memory storage, and (d) neuroimaging markers (left and right hippocampal volume). Analyses were conducted for all MCI, as well as for aMCI and naMCI sub-types. The CSA-Q was found to have concurrent validity with cognitive reserve proxies. Among all MCI, the CSA-Q dimensions of intensity and mental engagement had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume, but not with neuropsychological performance. For naMCI, the CSA-Q had moderate associations with left hippocampal volume, and small associations with aspects of executive functioning and processing speed. No equivalent associations emerged for the aMCI subtype. Our findings show that the CSA-Q may be particularly useful for older adults with non-amnestic cognitive deficits.
晚年参与认知刺激活动被认为有助于个体的认知储备,从而预防认知能力下降,但它与神经退行性变的临床标志物的关联尚未得到很好的确定。为了研究这一点,我们开发了一个 13 项的自我报告“认知刺激活动”问卷(CSA-Q),该问卷由 269 名有痴呆风险的社区老年人(>50 岁)完成。参与者符合轻度认知障碍(MCI)的标准,并被分类为遗忘型(aMCI;n=93)或非遗忘型(naMCI;n=176)。通过 23 名评分者小组,为活动 和 计算加权 CSA-Q 维度。检查 CSA-Q 平均值及其维度与:(a)人口统计学(年龄、性别),(b)认知储备代理(受教育年限、学前智商),(c)执行功能、处理速度、学习和记忆存储等认知领域的神经心理学标志物,以及(d)神经影像学标志物(左、右海马体积)的关系。对所有 MCI 以及 aMCI 和 naMCI 亚型进行了分析。CSA-Q 与认知储备代理具有同时效度。在所有 MCI 中,CSA-Q 的强度和心理投入维度与左海马体积中度相关,但与神经心理学表现无关。对于 naMCI,CSA-Q 与左海马体积中度相关,与执行功能和处理速度的某些方面也有中度相关。在 aMCI 亚型中没有出现等效的关联。我们的研究结果表明,CSA-Q 对于非遗忘型认知缺陷的老年人可能特别有用。