Alonso Mediavilla E, Campos-Juanatey F, Azcárraga Aranegui G, Varea Malo R, Ballestero Diego R, Domínguez Esteban M, Ramos Barseló E, Zubillaga Guerrero S, Calleja Hermosa P, Gutiérrez Baños J L
Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, España.
Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, España; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Cantabria, España.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Jul 28. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.06.001.
Ureteroileal anastomosis stricture is a frequent complication after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder formation. We analyze their incidence based on the technique for urinary diversion and on the surgical approach (open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted). Stricture management is described, along with surgical outcomes.
Descriptive retrospective study over 6 years in patients who underwent urinary diversion using ileum (ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder). Demographic data, comorbidities, surgical approach, complications, and outcomes were collected. Minimum follow-up of 1 year. Comparison between groups using Chi-square test for dichotomous variables. Quantitative variables were compared using the Student's t test for independent groups or Mann-Whitney test. Statistical significance if P<.05.
The study included 182 patients (84% males and 16% females). Mean age 68 years. Cystectomy approach: laparoscopic (67/37%), robot-assisted (63/35%), open (43/24%). Urinary diversion: ileal conduit (138/76%) and orthotopic ileal neobladder (44/24%). Ureteric reimplantation technique: Bricker (108/59%) and Wallace (47/26%). Ureteroileal anastomosis strictures (50/27%): bilateral (26), left (16) and right (8). Strictures according to cystectomy approach: laparoscopic (23/46%), robot-assisted (16/32%), open (9/18%). Treatment of strictures (33/18%): ureteric reimplantation (13), indwelling nephrostomy (13), endoscopic dilatation (4), nephroureterectomy (2), endoureterotomy (1). Ureteroileal reimplantation approach: laparoscopic (5/38%), robot-assisted (6/46%), open (2/15%). Outcomes after reimplantation: restenosis (0/0%), reintervention (3/23%), contralateral ureteroileal stricture (1/8%).
Surgical approach in cystectomy does not influence future development of ureteroileal strictures. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted ureteroileal reimplantation achieves high success rates.
输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄是根治性膀胱切除术及回肠膀胱术或原位新膀胱术形成术后常见的并发症。我们基于尿液改道技术及手术入路(开放、腹腔镜或机器人辅助)分析其发生率。描述了狭窄的处理方法及手术结果。
对6年间接受回肠尿液改道(回肠膀胱术或原位新膀胱术)的患者进行描述性回顾性研究。收集人口统计学数据、合并症、手术入路、并发症及结果。最短随访1年。对二分变量采用卡方检验进行组间比较。定量变量采用独立样本t检验或曼-惠特尼检验进行比较。P<0.05具有统计学意义。
该研究纳入182例患者(男性84%,女性16%)。平均年龄68岁。膀胱切除术入路:腹腔镜(67/37%)、机器人辅助(63/35%)、开放(43/24%)。尿液改道:回肠膀胱术(138/76%)和原位回肠新膀胱术(44/24%)。输尿管再植技术:Bricker术式(108/59%)和Wallace术式(47/26%)。输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄(50/27%):双侧(26例)、左侧(16例)和右侧(8例)。根据膀胱切除术入路的狭窄情况:腹腔镜(23/46%)、机器人辅助(16/32%)、开放(9/18%)。狭窄的治疗(33/18%):输尿管再植(13例)、留置肾造瘘(13例)、内镜扩张(4例)、肾输尿管切除术(2例)、输尿管内切开术(1例)。输尿管回肠再植入路:腹腔镜(5/38%)、机器人辅助(6/46%)、开放(2/15%)。再植术后结果:再狭窄(0/0%)、再次干预(3/23%)、对侧输尿管回肠狭窄(1/8%)。
膀胱切除术的手术入路不影响输尿管回肠狭窄的未来发展。腹腔镜和机器人辅助输尿管回肠再植成功率高。