Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine (JEC), St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Ophthalmology (RMS), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (BW, GPVS, LS) and Neurology (GPVS, LS), Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
J Neuroophthalmol. 2021 Dec 1;41(4):537-541. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001337.
Isolated third nerve palsy may indicate an expanding posterior communicating artery aneurysm, thus necessitating urgent arterial imaging. This study aims to assess the rate and duration of delays in arterial imaging for new isolated third nerve palsies, identify potential causes of delay, and evaluate instances of delay-related patient harm.
In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively reviewed 110 patient charts (aged 18 years and older) seen between November 2012 and June 2020 at the neuro-ophthalmology clinic and by the inpatient ophthalmology consultation service at a tertiary institution. All patients were referred for suspicion of or had a final diagnosis of third nerve palsy. Demographics, referral encounter details, physical examination findings, final diagnoses, timing of arterial imaging, etiologies of third nerve palsy, and details of patient harm were collected.
Of the 110 included patients, 62 (56.4%) were women, 88 (80%) were white, and the mean age was 61.8 ± 14.6 years. Forty (36.4%) patients received arterial imaging urgently. Patients suspected of third nerve palsy were not more likely to be sent for urgent evaluation (P = 0.29) or arterial imaging (P = 0.082) than patients in whom the referring doctor did not suspect palsy. Seventy-eight of 95 (82%) patients with a final diagnosis of third nerve palsy were correctly identified by referring providers. Of the 20 patients without any arterial imaging before neuro-ophthalmology consultation, there was a median delay of 24 days from symptom onset to imaging, and a median delay of 12.5 days between first medical contact for their symptoms and imaging. One patient was harmed as a result of delayed imaging.
Third nerve palsies were typically identified correctly, but referring providers failed to recognize the urgency of arterial imaging to rule out an aneurysmal etiology. Raising awareness of the urgency of arterial imaging may improve patient safety.
孤立性动眼神经麻痹可能提示后交通动脉扩张性动脉瘤,因此需要紧急进行动脉成像。本研究旨在评估新发孤立性动眼神经麻痹患者进行动脉成像的延迟率和持续时间,确定延迟的潜在原因,并评估与延迟相关的患者伤害事件。
本回顾性横断面研究纳入了 2012 年 11 月至 2020 年 6 月在一所三级医疗机构的神经眼科诊所和住院眼科会诊服务就诊的 110 例患者的病历(年龄≥18 岁)。所有患者均因疑似或最终诊断为动眼神经麻痹而就诊。收集患者的人口统计学资料、就诊时的详细信息、体格检查结果、最终诊断、动脉成像时间、动眼神经麻痹的病因以及患者伤害的详细信息。
110 例患者中,62 例(56.4%)为女性,88 例(80%)为白人,平均年龄为 61.8±14.6 岁。40 例(36.4%)患者接受了紧急动脉成像检查。怀疑动眼神经麻痹的患者与未怀疑动眼神经麻痹的患者相比,更不可能被紧急评估(P=0.29)或进行动脉成像(P=0.082)。95 例最终诊断为动眼神经麻痹的患者中,78 例(82%)被转诊医生正确识别。在接受神经眼科会诊之前未进行任何动脉成像的 20 例患者中,从症状发作到成像的中位延迟时间为 24 天,从首次出现症状到成像的中位延迟时间为 12.5 天。1 例患者因延迟成像而受到伤害。
动眼神经麻痹通常能被正确识别,但转诊医生未能认识到进行动脉成像以排除动脉瘤病因的紧迫性。提高对动脉成像紧迫性的认识可能会提高患者安全性。