Prince Mark A, Jenzer Tiffany, Brown Whitney, Hetelekides Eleftherios M, Mumm Rachel A, Collins R Lorraine
Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Drugs Alcohol Today. 2019 Oct 23;19(4):295-305. doi: 10.1108/dat-10-2018-0061. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
PURPOSE –: Cannabis use among young adults is increasing, despite being associated with several negative consequences. Protective behavioral strategies (PBSs) are a potential mechanism of behavior change for reducing substance use, yet PBS use for cannabis is not well understood. The purpose of this paper is to further define and measure the PBS construct for cannabis.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH –: A community sample of cannabis users (n = 54) participated in eight focus groups discussing the use of PBSs. Participants completed surveys regarding demographics, cannabis use habits and cannabis problems. The authors also administered an existing measure of cannabis PBS and asked them to generate new or unique protective strategies that they had used or had heard of others using.
FINDINGS –: Thematic analysis of qualitative focus group data provided information about cannabis users' reasons for regulating cannabis use (e.g. health or legal problems, interpersonal) as well as strategies to moderate cannabis use or attenuate their risk for experiencing adverse consequences (e.g. distraction, existential/spiritual strategies). Analyses of quantitative survey data revealed that use of PBSs was negatively correlated with cannabis outcomes. Perceived helpfulness of strategies was an important predictor of decreased cannabis use and adverse consequences.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS –: Findings expand the understanding of the definition and measurement of strategies for regulating cannabis use and reducing related risk of experiencing adverse consequences.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE –: This is the first study to examine cannabis-related PBS using both qualitative and quantitative methods, which provide insights into the definition of PBS and for future refinements of PBS measurement.
尽管大麻使用与多种负面后果相关,但年轻人中的大麻使用仍在增加。保护性行为策略(PBSs)是减少物质使用行为改变的一种潜在机制,然而对于大麻使用的PBS运用情况尚不十分清楚。本文的目的是进一步界定和衡量针对大麻的PBS结构。
设计/方法/途径:一个大麻使用者社区样本(n = 54)参与了8个关于PBS运用的焦点小组讨论。参与者完成了关于人口统计学、大麻使用习惯和大麻相关问题的调查。作者还实施了一项现有的大麻PBS测量,并要求他们提出自己使用过或听说过其他人使用的新的或独特的保护策略。
对定性焦点小组数据的主题分析提供了有关大麻使用者规范大麻使用的原因(如健康或法律问题、人际关系)以及适度使用大麻或减轻其遭受不良后果风险的策略(如分散注意力、存在主义/精神策略)的信息。定量调查数据分析表明,PBS的使用与大麻相关结果呈负相关。策略的感知有用性是大麻使用减少和不良后果减少的重要预测因素。
研究局限性/启示:研究结果扩展了对规范大麻使用及降低相关不良后果风险策略的定义和测量的理解。
原创性/价值:这是第一项同时使用定性和定量方法研究与大麻相关的PBS的研究,为PBS的定义及未来PBS测量的改进提供了见解。