• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Alcohol and marijuana protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between substance use identity and use-related outcomes: A multi-sample examination.酒精和大麻的保护性行为策略介导了物质使用身份与使用相关结果之间的关系:一项多样本研究。
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106613. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106613. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Use of Both Alcohol and Cannabis Protective Behavioral Strategies is Associated with Fewer Negative Consequences: A Moderation Analysis.同时使用酒精和大麻保护性行为策略与较少的负面后果相关:一项调节分析。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(8):989-995. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2201842. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
Predictive Utility of Protective Behavioral Strategies for Alcohol-Related Outcomes in a Community Sample of Young Adults.保护行为策略对年轻成人社区样本中与酒精相关结果的预测效用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021 Jul;82(4):476-485.
4
Profiles of alcohol and cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across two large, multi-site college student samples of concurrent alcohol and cannabis users.在两个大型、多地点的同时使用酒精和大麻的大学生样本中,研究了酒精和大麻保护性行为策略的使用情况。
Addict Behav. 2023 Nov;146:107789. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107789. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Criterion Validity of Protective Behavioral Strategies for Alcohol Consumption among College Students: Comparison across Two Measures.大学生饮酒防护行为策略的效标效度:两种测量方法的比较。
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2125275. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
6
The Relationship Between Risk Factors and Alcohol and Marijuana Use Outcomes Among Concurrent Users: A Comprehensive Examination of Protective Behavioral Strategies.风险因素与同时使用酒精和大麻者的使用后果之间的关系:对保护性行为策略的综合考察。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2019 Jan;80(1):102-108. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.102.
7
Use of protective behavioral strategies and blackout experience among mandated college students.被强制参加大学的学生中使用保护性行为策略和昏迷经历。
Addict Behav. 2022 Sep;132:107340. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107340. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
8
Alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies as a mediator of the relationship between drinking motives and risky sexual behaviors.酒精相关保护性行为策略在饮酒动机与危险性行为关系中的中介作用。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;93:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
A cross-lagged panel model examining protective behavioral strategies: are types of strategies differentially related to alcohol use and consequences?一个检验保护性行为策略的交叉滞后面板模型:不同类型的策略与酒精使用及后果之间的关系是否存在差异?
Addict Behav. 2014 Feb;39(2):480-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
College Alcohol Beliefs and Alcohol Outcomes: The Mediating Effects of Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies.大学生酒精信念与酒精相关后果:酒精保护行为策略的中介作用。
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(14):2389-2394. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1817085. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the associations between protective behavioral strategies and heavy alcohol consumption and consequences among young adults.一项关于保护性行为策略与年轻成年人重度饮酒和后果之间关联的系统评价。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Jun;38(4):488-506. doi: 10.1037/adb0001002. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Profiles of alcohol and cannabis protective behavioral strategies use across two large, multi-site college student samples of concurrent alcohol and cannabis users.在两个大型、多地点的同时使用酒精和大麻的大学生样本中,研究了酒精和大麻保护性行为策略的使用情况。
Addict Behav. 2023 Nov;146:107789. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107789. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
A Scoping Review of Risk and Protective Factors for Negative Cannabis Use Consequences.大麻负面使用后果的风险与保护因素的范围综述
Subst Abuse. 2023 Apr 7;17:11782218231166622. doi: 10.1177/11782218231166622. eCollection 2023.
4
The nomological network of drinker identity: A scoping review.饮酒者身份的规律网络:范围综述。
Addict Behav. 2023 Jun;141:107654. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107654. Epub 2023 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Gambling Identity Predict Unique Variance in Negative Gambling-Related Outcomes: An Examination of Direct and Interactive Associations.赌博身份是否能预测负面赌博相关结果的独特方差:直接和交互关联的检验。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Dec;36(4):1361-1377. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09885-6.
2
Is marijuana identity associated with marijuana use and consequences? An examination of direct and interactive associations.大麻身份与大麻使用和后果有关吗?对直接和交互关联的检验。
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(8):1286-1296. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2019.1573835. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
Marijuana protective behavioral strategies and marijuana refusal self-efficacy: Independent and interactive effects on marijuana-related outcomes.大麻保护性行为策略和大麻拒绝自我效能:对大麻相关结果的独立和交互影响。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;33(4):412-419. doi: 10.1037/adb0000445. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
4
A randomized control trial of a deviance regulation theory intervention to increase alcohol protective strategies.一项基于偏差调节理论的随机对照试验干预,以增加酒精保护策略。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;86(12):1061-1075. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000347.
5
Identity as a cannabis user is related to problematic patterns of consumption among emerging adults.身份认同为大麻使用者与新兴成年人中存在问题的消费模式有关。
Addict Behav. 2018 Apr;79:138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.021. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
Examining Women's Alcohol Consumption: The Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-Identity.审视女性饮酒行为:计划行为理论与自我认同
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jan 2;53(1):128-136. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1327972. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
Does change in self-perceived problem drinker identity relate to change in alcohol use? An examination of nontreatment seeking hazardous drinkers.自我认知的问题饮酒者身份的改变与饮酒行为的改变有关吗?对未寻求治疗的危险饮酒者的一项调查。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Sep;31(6):721-726. doi: 10.1037/adb0000305. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
8
The Protective Behavioral Strategies for Marijuana Scale: Further examination using item response theory.大麻保护性行为策略量表:使用项目反应理论的进一步检验。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):548-559. doi: 10.1037/adb0000271. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
9
College-Related Alcohol Beliefs and Problematic Alcohol Consumption: Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Mediator.与大学相关的酒精观念和酒精消费问题:酒精保护性行为策略作为中介因素
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jul 3;52(8):1059-1068. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1271985. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
10
College student marijuana involvement: Perceptions, use, and consequences across 11 college campuses.大学生涉大麻情况:11所大学校园的认知、使用及后果
Addict Behav. 2017 Mar;66:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

酒精和大麻的保护性行为策略介导了物质使用身份与使用相关结果之间的关系:一项多样本研究。

Alcohol and marijuana protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between substance use identity and use-related outcomes: A multi-sample examination.

作者信息

Montes Kevin S, Dela Cruz Margott, Weinstein Andrew P, Pearson Matthew R, Lindgren Kristen P, Neighbors Clayton

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, CA, USA.

Department of Psychology, California State University, Dominguez Hills, CA, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106613. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106613. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106613
PMID:32891978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8152931/
Abstract

Substance use identity has been consistently associated with problematic substance use. Limited attention has considered mechanisms of this association. This research examined whether greater identification as a drinker or marijuana user would be associated with the use of fewer alcohol/marijuana protective behavioral strategies (PBS; e.g., avoiding drinking games/avoiding using marijuana in public places). Further, PBS have been associated with lower levels of negative alcohol/marijuana-related outcomes (i.e., frequency, quantity, consequences). In the current multi-sample study, PBS were examined as a mediator of the relationship between drinking/marijuana identity and alcohol/marijuana-related outcomes across three studies. Study 1 was an intervention study with heavy drinking college students (N = 605), Study 2 was a multisite study of marijuana outcomes among college students (N = 2,077), and Study 3 was a study of substance use in a community sample (n = 369; n = 146). Cross-sectional and/or longitudinal data were collected across studies. Substance use identity, PBS, and use-related outcomes were measured across the three studies. Indirect effects were evaluated by Monte Carlo confidence intervals. Manner of Drinking PBS were found to be the only statistically significant mediator of the relationship between drinking identity and alcohol-related outcomes (i.e., quantity and consequences) cross-sectionally. These significant cross-sectional mediation effects for alcohol were replicated in one of three longitudinal models. Marijuana PBS were also found to mediate the relationship between marijuana identity and all marijuana-related outcomes examined in the current study. Study findings may help to inform the development of identity-based and PBS-based interventions that aim to reduce negative alcohol/marijuana-related outcomes.

摘要

物质使用身份一直与有问题的物质使用相关联。很少有研究关注这种关联的机制。本研究考察了更强的饮酒者或大麻使用者身份认同是否会与较少使用酒精/大麻保护性行为策略(PBS;例如,避免饮酒游戏/避免在公共场所使用大麻)相关。此外,PBS与较低水平的与酒精/大麻相关的负面结果(即频率、数量、后果)有关。在当前的多样本研究中,在三项研究中考察了PBS作为饮酒/大麻身份与酒精/大麻相关结果之间关系的中介变量。研究1是一项针对重度饮酒大学生的干预研究(N = 605),研究2是一项关于大学生大麻使用结果的多地点研究(N = 2077),研究3是一项社区样本中的物质使用研究(n = 369;n = 146)。在各项研究中收集了横断面和/或纵向数据。在三项研究中测量了物质使用身份、PBS和与使用相关的结果。通过蒙特卡洛置信区间评估间接效应。饮酒方式PBS被发现是横断面饮酒身份与酒精相关结果(即数量和后果)之间关系的唯一具有统计学意义的中介变量。这些酒精方面的显著横断面中介效应在三个纵向模型中的一个中得到了重复。大麻PBS也被发现中介了大麻身份与本研究中考察的所有大麻相关结果之间的关系。研究结果可能有助于为旨在减少与酒精/大麻相关负面结果的基于身份和基于PBS的干预措施的开发提供信息。