Le Maitre Christine L, Dahia Chitra L, Giers Morgan, Illien-Junger Svenja, Cicione Claudia, Samartzis Dino, Vadala Gianluca, Fields Aaron, Lotz Jeffrey
Biomolecular Sciences Research Centre Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK.
Orthopaedic Soft Tissue Research Program Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York USA.
JOR Spine. 2021 Jul 19;4(2):e1167. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1167. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Histopathological analysis of intervertebral disc (IVD) tissues is a critical domain of back pain research. Identification, description, and classification of attributes that distinguish abnormal tissues form a basis for probing disease mechanisms and conceiving novel therapies. Unfortunately, lack of standardized methods and nomenclature can limit comparisons of results across studies and prevent organizing information into a clear representation of the hierarchical, spatial, and temporal patterns of IVD degeneration. Thus, the following Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) Spine Section Initiative aimed to develop a standardized histopathology scoring scheme for human IVD degeneration.
Guided by a working group of experts, this prospective process entailed a series of stages that consisted of reviewing and assessing past grading schemes, surveying IVD researchers globally on current practice and recommendations for a new grading system, utilizing expert opinion a taxonomy of histological grading was developed, and validation performed.
A standardized taxonomy was developed, which showed excellent intra-rater reliability for scoring nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF), and cartilaginous end plate (CEP) regions (interclass correlation [ICC] > .89). The ability to reliably detect subtle changes varied by IVD region, being poorest in the NP (ICC: .89-.95) where changes at the cellular level were important, vs the AF (ICC: .93-.98), CEP (ICC: .97-.98), and boney end plate (ICC: .96-.99) where matrix and structural changes varied more dramatically with degeneration.
The proposed grading system incorporates more comprehensive descriptions of degenerative features for all the IVD sub-tissues than prior criteria. While there was excellent reliability, our results reinforce the need for improved training, particularly for novice raters. Future evaluation of the proposed system in real-world settings (eg, at the microscope) will be needed to further refine criteria and more fully evaluate utility. This improved taxonomy could aid in the understanding of IVD degeneration phenotypes and their association with back pain.
椎间盘(IVD)组织的组织病理学分析是背痛研究的关键领域。识别、描述和分类区分异常组织的属性,为探究疾病机制和构思新疗法奠定了基础。不幸的是,缺乏标准化方法和术语会限制各研究结果之间的比较,并阻碍将信息整理成IVD退变的层次、空间和时间模式的清晰呈现。因此,以下骨科研究协会(ORS)脊柱分会倡议旨在为人类IVD退变制定标准化的组织病理学评分方案。
在一个专家工作组的指导下,这个前瞻性过程包括一系列阶段,包括回顾和评估过去的分级方案,对全球IVD研究人员进行关于当前实践和新分级系统建议的调查,利用专家意见制定组织学分级分类法,并进行验证。
制定了一个标准化分类法,该分类法在对髓核(NP)、纤维环(AF)和软骨终板(CEP)区域评分时显示出极好的评分者内信度(组内相关系数[ICC]>0.89)。可靠检测细微变化的能力因IVD区域而异,在NP中最差(ICC:0.89 - 0.95),在NP中细胞水平的变化很重要,而在AF(ICC:0.93 - 0.98)、CEP(ICC:0.97 - 0.98)和骨终板(ICC:0.96 - 0.99)中,随着退变,基质和结构变化更为显著。
与先前标准相比,所提出的分级系统对所有IVD亚组织的退变特征纳入了更全面的描述。虽然有极好的信度,但我们的结果强化了改进培训的必要性,特别是对新手评分者。未来需要在实际环境(如在显微镜下)对所提出的系统进行评估,以进一步完善标准并更全面地评估实用性。这种改进的分类法有助于理解IVD退变表型及其与背痛的关联。