• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安排输精管切除术后精液分析的预约对依从性没有影响。

Scheduling Appointments for Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Has No Impact on Compliance.

作者信息

Jacobsen Frederik M, Jensen Christian Fuglesang S, Fode Mikkel, Sønksen Jens, Ohl Dana A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020 Nov 20;22:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.006. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.006
PMID:34337480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8317907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is recommended 8-16 wk after vasectomy to ensure azoospermia. Patient compliance with submitting a semen sample for PVSA has historically been low. To increase patient compliance, a policy change was made to schedule patients for PVSA appointments instead of a previous "drop-in" option.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient compliance for PVSA when scheduling appointments as opposed to a "drop-in" appointment 8-16 wk after the procedure.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Ethical approval was obtained to retrospectively evaluate patients undergoing vasectomy. A total of 400 patients were evaluated, 200 consecutive patients before and 200 after the policy change. Patients were excluded from analysis if they had other surgeries at the same time of vasectomy or if the vasectomy was a repeat procedure.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Percent of patients attending PVSA and time to PVSA were assessed. Nominal data were compared using chi-square analysis and interval data were compared using Student unpaired test.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Thirteen patients were excluded from analysis: six before and seven after the policy change. Compliance rates were similar before and after the policy change (144/194 [74%] and 154/193 [80%],  = 0.19). There was no difference in the time from vasectomy to PVSA between groups (before: mean [standard deviation] 69 [55] d vs after: 74 (63) d,  = 0.44). This study is limited by its retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Scheduling appointments for PVSA has no impact on compliance rates or the time between vasectomy and semen analysis when compared with "drop-in" appointments.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Sterility after a vasectomy is guaranteed by delivering a semen sample. Many men do not deliver this sample, and sterility cannot be guaranteed. This study found that scheduling appointments did not increase the number of men who delivered a semen sample compared with "drop-in" appointments.

摘要

背景

输精管结扎术后精液分析(PVSA)建议在输精管结扎术后8 - 16周进行,以确保无精子症。以往患者提交PVSA精液样本的依从性较低。为提高患者依从性,政策发生了改变,为患者安排PVSA预约,而非之前的“随时来”选项。

目的

比较输精管结扎术后8 - 16周安排预约与“随时来”预约时患者进行PVSA的依从性。

设计、地点和参与者:获得伦理批准以回顾性评估接受输精管结扎术的患者。共评估了400例患者,政策改变前连续200例患者,政策改变后200例患者。若患者在输精管结扎术同时进行了其他手术,或输精管结扎术为重复手术,则排除在分析之外。

结果测量和统计分析

评估患者参加PVSA的百分比和PVSA的时间。使用卡方分析比较名义数据,使用学生非配对t检验比较区间数据。

结果和局限性

13例患者被排除在分析之外:政策改变前6例,政策改变后7例。政策改变前后的依从率相似(144/194 [74%] 和154/193 [80%],P = 0.19)。两组从输精管结扎术到PVSA的时间无差异(之前:平均[标准差]69 [55]天,之后:74 [63]天,P = 0.44)。本研究受其回顾性设计的限制。

结论

与“随时来”预约相比,为PVSA安排预约对依从率或输精管结扎术与精液分析之间的时间没有影响。

患者总结

输精管结扎术后通过提交精液样本可确保不育。许多男性未提交该样本,不育无法得到保证。本研究发现,与“随时来”预约相比,安排预约并未增加提交精液样本的男性数量。

相似文献

1
Scheduling Appointments for Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Has No Impact on Compliance.安排输精管切除术后精液分析的预约对依从性没有影响。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020 Nov 20;22:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.10.006. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Driving Time and Compliance With Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Drop-Off.输精管切除术后精液分析送检的驾驶时间与依从性
Urology. 2024 Feb;184:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.11.027. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
A new approach to postvasectomy semen analyses eliminates the need to evaluate a fresh specimen.一种新的输精管结扎术后精液分析方法消除了评估新鲜标本的需要。
Andrology. 2023 Mar;11(3):464-470. doi: 10.1111/andr.13331. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Postvasectomy semen analysis: are men following up?输精管切除术后精液分析:男性会进行随访吗?
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Jan-Feb;18(1):44-7. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.18.1.44.
5
Reasons for not completing postvasectomy semen analysis.未完成输精管结扎术后精液分析的原因。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Sep;65(9):e391-e396.
6
Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on postvasectomy outcomes in a military population.2012年美国泌尿外科学会输精管切除术指南对军人输精管切除术后结局的影响。
Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.010. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Reduced Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Testing With the Implementation of Special Clearance Parameters.通过实施特殊许可参数减少输精管切除术后的精液分析检测
Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
8
Patient Portal Engagement Affects Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Completion.患者门户参与度影响输精管结扎术后精液分析的完成情况。
Urology. 2024 Mar;185:137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.12.027. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Patient noncompliance after vasectomy.输精管切除术后患者的不依从性。
Fertil Steril. 1997 Sep;68(3):552-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00251-3.
10
Poor Compliance With Postvasectomy Semen Testing: Analysis of Factors and Barriers.精液检测后遵医行为差:因素与障碍分析。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.026. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-vasectomy semen analysis: what is the best protocol?输精管切除术后精液分析:最佳方案是什么?
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Mar 29. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01052-3.
2
Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.输精管切除术技术、恢复情况及并发症的比较:技巧与窍门
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.
3
Post-Vasectomy Semen Analysis: What's All the Fuss about?输精管结扎术后精液分析:究竟在 fuss 些什么? (注:fuss 在这里不好直接准确翻译,可理解为“大惊小怪、小题大做等”意思,整体翻译需结合语境灵活处理,这里保留英文待结合具体内容准确意译。) 更准确译文:输精管结扎术后精液分析:究竟为何如此大惊小怪?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 12;14(20):2275. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202275.
4
Providing a post-vasectomy semen analysis cup at the time of vasectomy rather than post-operatively improves compliance.输精管结扎术时提供输精管切除术后精液分析杯而非术后提供,可提高依从性。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):72-79. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-400. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Poor Compliance With Postvasectomy Semen Testing: Analysis of Factors and Barriers.精液检测后遵医行为差:因素与障碍分析。
Urology. 2020 Feb;136:146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.026. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
Legal Review of Vasectomy Litigation and the Variables Impacting Trial Outcomes.输精管切除术诉讼的法律审查及影响审判结果的变量
Urology. 2019 Sep;131:120-124. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Evaluation of Vasectomy Trends in the United States.美国输精管切除术趋势评估
Urology. 2018 Aug;118:76-79. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
4
Optimizing outcomes in vasectomy: how to ensure sterility and prevent complications.优化输精管结扎术的效果:如何确保绝育并预防并发症。
Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Apr;5(2):176-80. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.03.04.
5
Reduced Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Testing With the Implementation of Special Clearance Parameters.通过实施特殊许可参数减少输精管切除术后的精液分析检测
Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
6
Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on postvasectomy outcomes in a military population.2012年美国泌尿外科学会输精管切除术指南对军人输精管切除术后结局的影响。
Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.010. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
7
Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on post-vasectomy outcomes.2012 年美国泌尿外科学会输精管结扎术指南对输精管结扎术后结局的影响。
J Urol. 2014 Jan;191(1):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.07.086. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
8
Compliance with semen analysis.精液分析的依从性。
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2248-51. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.062. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
9
Vasectomy: AUA guideline.输精管切除术:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6 Suppl):2482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.080. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy.欧洲泌尿外科学会输精管切除术指南。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 19.