• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输精管切除术技术、恢复情况及并发症的比较:技巧与窍门

Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.

作者信息

Borrell Joseph A, Gu Catherine, Ye Nancy, Mills Jesse N, Andino Juan J

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5
PMID:39890927
Abstract

Vasectomies are safe and effective, achieving up to 99.7% in sterilization, with complication rates around 1-2%. As vasectomy uptake rises, physicians should stay informed about counseling, isolation and occlusion techniques, post-op recovery, and associated risks and complications. Historically, pre-vasectomy counseling has been performed in-person, but recent literature has shown that telehealth is a viable alternative, and a physical exam may not be necessitated. With regard to vas isolation and occlusion, current international guidelines support a minimally invasive approach such as no-scalpel vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition, as they are the most effective in achieving vasectomy success and have the lowest complication rates. After a vasectomy, patients should undergo a post-vasectomy semen analysis 8-16 weeks after the procedure to ensure severe non-motile oligozoospermia (≤100,000 non-motile sperm/mL) or azoospermia. While risks and complications from vas isolation and occlusion are rare, patients should be informed about the potential for hematomas, infections, postoperative pain, and vas recanalization. In the U.S, vasectomies have increased in utilization from previous years, likely in the setting of increased access to telehealth and restricted female reproductive access. This trend raises questions about future fertility options such as vasectomy reversals and highlights the need for informed decision-making.

摘要

输精管切除术安全有效,绝育成功率高达99.7%,并发症发生率约为1%-2%。随着输精管切除术的接受率上升,医生应了解咨询、输精管分离和闭塞技术、术后恢复以及相关风险和并发症。从历史上看,输精管切除术前咨询是面对面进行的,但最近的文献表明,远程医疗是一种可行的替代方式,可能不需要进行体格检查。关于输精管分离和闭塞,目前的国际指南支持采用微创方法,如无手术刀输精管切除术加黏膜烧灼和筋膜插入,因为它们在输精管切除术中成功率最高,并发症发生率最低。输精管切除术后,患者应在术后8-16周进行精液分析,以确保出现严重的无活动力少精子症(≤100,000个无活动力精子/毫升)或无精子症。虽然输精管分离和闭塞的风险和并发症很少见,但应告知患者有发生血肿、感染、术后疼痛和输精管再通的可能性。在美国,输精管切除术的使用率比前几年有所增加,这可能是由于远程医疗的可及性增加以及女性生殖途径受限。这一趋势引发了关于未来生育选择(如输精管复通术)的问题,并凸显了知情决策的必要性。

相似文献

1
Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.输精管切除术技术、恢复情况及并发症的比较:技巧与窍门
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.
2
Vasectomy by ligation and excision, with or without fascial interposition: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN77781689].输精管结扎切除术,伴或不伴筋膜置入:一项随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN77781689]
BMC Med. 2004 Mar 31;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-6.
3
Clinical aspects of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995.1995年在美国进行输精管切除术的临床情况。
Urology. 1998 Oct;52(4):685-91. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00274-x.
4
Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization.用于男性绝育的输精管结扎闭塞技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 30;2014(3):CD003991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub4.
5
A comparison of vas occlusion techniques: cautery more effective than ligation and excision with fascial interposition.血管闭塞技术的比较:电烙术比结扎术及带筋膜间置的切除术更有效。
BMC Urol. 2004 Oct 27;4(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-4-12.
6
Relationship between vas occlusion techniques and recanalization.血管闭塞技术与再通之间的关系。
Adv Contracept Deliv Syst. 1994;10(3-4):153-9.
7
Vasal sterilization in China.中国的输精管绝育术。
Contraception. 1993 Sep;48(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90144-v.
8
Prospective comparison of ligation and bipolar cautery technique in non-scalpel vasectomy.非手术刀输精管结扎术中结扎术与双极电凝技术的前瞻性比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Nov-Dec;41(6):1172-7. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0356.
9
Vasectomy: AUA guideline.输精管切除术:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6 Suppl):2482-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.080. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
10
Vasectomy occlusion techniques for male sterilization.用于男性绝育的输精管结扎闭塞技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):CD003991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Male Hormonal Contraception-Current Stage of Knowledge.男性激素避孕——当前的知识阶段
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 23;14(7):2188. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072188.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware.人工智能聊天机器人对输精管切除术相关问题回答的准确性和可读性:公众需谨慎。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e67996. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67996. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Comparative review of vasectomy guidelines and novel vasal occlusion techniques.输精管结扎术指南与新型血管阻塞技术的比较综述。
Andrology. 2024 Oct;12(7):1541-1546. doi: 10.1111/andr.13665. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Vasectomy: An increasingly common procedure in France.输精管切除术:法国越来越常见的手术。
Fr J Urol. 2024 Jun;34(5):102640. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102640. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following .输精管切除术咨询和手术的短期变化。
Urol Pract. 2024 May;11(3):517-525. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000528. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
5
Financial decision analysis based on "willingness to pay" for surgical sperm retrieval approaches among men with non-obstructive azoospermia in the United States.基于美国非梗阻性无精子症男性对手术取精方法的“支付意愿”的财务决策分析。
Andrology. 2024 Feb;12(2):422-428. doi: 10.1111/andr.13488. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Risk of post-vasectomy infections in 133,044 vasectomies from four international vasectomy practices.来自四个国际输精管绝育实践的 133044 例输精管绝育术后感染风险。
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Jul-Aug;49(4):490-500. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0143.
7
Telehealth Sterilization Consultation Does Not Impact Likelihood of Vasectomy: A Retrospective Institutional Analysis.远程医疗绝育咨询并不影响输精管切除术的可能性:回顾性机构分析。
Urology. 2023 Jun;176:79-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.019. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
8
Down But Not Out: Vasectomy Is Faring Poorly Almost Everywhere-We Can Do Better To Make It A True Method Option.虽受阻但未被弃:输精管切除术在各地表现不佳——我们可以做得更好,使其成为真正的方法选择。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2023 Feb 28;11(1). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00369.
9
[Recommendations of the Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the AFU concerning the management of Vasectomy].[俄罗斯泌尿学协会男科学与性医学委员会关于输精管切除术管理的建议]
Prog Urol. 2023 Apr;33(5):223-236. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
10
Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.在美国堕胎权联邦保护措施被撤销后,输精管切除术数量不断增加。
Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):265-268. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x. Epub 2023 Feb 14.