Department of Rehabilitation, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jul;25(14):4702-4713. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202107_26381.
To compare the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) with other treatment modalities for management of HSP in terms of relieving pain and improving range of motion of shoulder joints.
An electronic search was carried out in PubMed, CENTRAL, SCOPUS and EMBASE databases using a series of relevant keywords, along with a manual search. Randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of SSNB with placebo injections, intra-articular injections (IAI), ultrasound and Pulsed RF were identified. The outcomes assessed were pain relief measured with visual analogue scale and improvement in the range of motion (ROM) at the end of the follow-up period. The meta-analysis was carried out for quantitative analysis of outcome data.
Eight randomized clinical trials were included. The quality of the included trials was low to moderate. SSNB showed improved pain relief at the end of 1 month, compared to placebo (normal saline injections) with mean difference (MD) 1.20 95% CI [0.59,1.80], p<0.0001. When compared to Pulsed radio-frequency (RF), the pain relief at the end of 1 month and 3 months was greater for patients treated with Pulsed RF than SSNB. No significant improvement in the range of motion for flexion, external and internal rotation was observed between SSNB and inter-articular injections.
SSNB is more effective in pain relief than placebo injections and ultrasound, but similar to pulsed RF. Similar effectiveness in ROM improvement was observed with SSNB and intra-articular injections.
比较肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)与其他治疗方式在缓解疼痛和改善肩关节活动度方面治疗 HSP 的疗效。
在 PubMed、CENTRAL、SCOPUS 和 EMBASE 数据库中使用一系列相关关键词进行电子检索,并进行手动检索。确定了比较 SSNB 与安慰剂注射、关节内注射(IAI)、超声和脉冲射频疗效的随机临床试验。评估的结局是使用视觉模拟量表测量的疼痛缓解程度和随访期末关节活动度(ROM)的改善。对结局数据进行了荟萃分析。
纳入了 8 项随机临床试验。纳入研究的质量为低至中度。与安慰剂(生理盐水注射)相比,SSNB 在 1 个月时疼痛缓解更明显,平均差值(MD)为 1.20[95%CI:0.59,1.80],p<0.0001。与脉冲射频(RF)相比,接受脉冲 RF 治疗的患者在 1 个月和 3 个月时的疼痛缓解程度大于接受 SSNB 治疗的患者。SSNB 与关节内注射之间,在屈曲、外展和内旋的 ROM 方面没有观察到明显改善。
SSNB 在缓解疼痛方面比安慰剂注射和超声更有效,但与脉冲 RF 相似。SSNB 与关节内注射在改善 ROM 方面的效果相似。