Suppr超能文献

肩胛上神经阻滞与物理治疗、安慰剂及关节内注射治疗慢性肩痛有效性的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Suprascapular Nerve Block With Physical Therapy, Placebo, and Intra-Articular Injection in Management of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Chang Ke-Vin, Hung Chen-Yu, Wu Wei-Ting, Han Der-Sheng, Yang Rong-Sen, Lin Chih-Peng

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug;97(8):1366-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) at different timing after administration compared with physical therapy, placebo, and intra-articular injections in patients with chronic shoulder pain.

DATA SOURCE

Two electronic data sources, PubMed and Scopus, were mainly searched from the earliest record to September 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Eleven randomized controlled trials that compared SSNB with physical therapy, placebo, and intra-articular injections were included, comprising 591 patients.

DATA EXTRACTION

Patient demographics, regimens for SSNB and intra-articular injections, use of fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance, conjunction with physical therapy, methods of randomization, and measurements of functional change and pain improvement were retrieved. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) of pain relief and functional improvement were calculated 1, 4, and 12 weeks after intervention.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Regarding pain relief, SSNB provided better pain relief for 12 weeks compared with physical therapy (SMD=.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], .35-1.14) and placebo injections (SMD=.70; 95% CI, .40-1.00), but was not superior to intra-articular injections. Differences in patient populations and use of pulsed radiofrequency did not cause a significant variation in therapeutic efficacy, but guidance using ultrasound showed consistently better effectiveness than guidance using surface landmarks and fluoroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated the superiority of SSNB to placebo and physical therapy and a similar efficacy of SSNB compared with intra-articular injection for treatment of chronic shoulder pain. Ultrasound was the most preferable guidance tool, and future studies are advised to integrate physical therapy in order to improve the long-term effectiveness of SSNB.

摘要

目的

探讨在慢性肩痛患者中,与物理治疗、安慰剂及关节内注射相比,肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)在给药后不同时间点的有效性。

数据来源

主要检索了两个电子数据源,即PubMed和Scopus,检索时间从最早记录至2015年9月。

研究选择

纳入了11项比较SSNB与物理治疗、安慰剂及关节内注射的随机对照试验,共591例患者。

数据提取

检索了患者人口统计学资料、SSNB和关节内注射方案、荧光镜或超声引导的使用情况、与物理治疗的联合使用情况、随机化方法以及功能变化和疼痛改善的测量指标。在干预后1周、4周和12周计算疼痛缓解和功能改善的标准化均数差(SMD)。

数据综合

在疼痛缓解方面,与物理治疗(SMD = 0.75;95%置信区间[CI],0.35 - 1.14)和安慰剂注射(SMD = 0.70;95% CI,0.40 - 1.00)相比,SSNB在12周内提供了更好的疼痛缓解,但并不优于关节内注射。患者人群差异和脉冲射频的使用并未导致治疗效果出现显著差异,但超声引导始终显示出比体表标志和荧光镜引导更好的有效性。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,SSNB在治疗慢性肩痛方面优于安慰剂和物理治疗,且与关节内注射疗效相似。超声是最优选的引导工具,建议未来研究将物理治疗纳入其中,以提高SSNB的长期有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验