• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人年龄相关的食欲和厌恶联想学习差异。

Adult age-related differences in appetitive and aversive associative learning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.

出版信息

Emotion. 2021 Sep;21(6):1239-1251. doi: 10.1037/emo0000860. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000860
PMID:34338541
Abstract

This study investigated age differences in appetitive and aversive associative learning using a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. Appetitive and aversive associative learning is the process by which an initially neutral cue is systematically paired with an aversive or appetitive outcome, eventually itself prompting aversive or appetitive responses. Mimicking the motivational shift from a primary gain orientation in young adulthood toward a stronger orientation toward loss prevention in old age, we expected older adults to learn associations between novel stimuli and losses more rapidly than associating neutral cues with gains (here: donations to charity). A pilot study ( = 214, 18-81 years) established the equivalence of monetary gains and losses for a charitable donation across adulthood. Based on these data, an experiment using an associative conditioning paradigm assessed the extent and temporal dynamics of appetitive and aversive learning across adulthood ( = 122, 19-80 years). Results suggest that younger adults form gain-related associations at a higher learning rate compared to losses. By contrast, with increasing age, adults more rapidly track the valence of conditioned stimuli with losses than gains. This differential learning pattern cannot be attributed to age-differences in arousal or expectancy. Results suggest that the negative valence of losses drives learning more efficiently in older age groups, while younger age groups are more sensitive to the positive valence of gains. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究采用巴甫洛夫条件反射范式,考察了在奖赏性和厌恶性联想学习中年龄差异。奖赏性和厌恶性联想学习是指一个最初中性的线索与厌恶性或奖赏性的结果有系统地配对,最终该线索本身会引起厌恶性或奖赏性的反应。为了模拟从青年期以获得为主要动机的转变,到老年期更强烈地倾向于预防损失的动机转变,我们预期老年人会比将中性线索与获得(此处为向慈善机构捐款)更快地学习到新刺激与损失之间的联系。一项初步研究(n=214,18-81 岁)确定了在整个成年期,慈善捐款中金钱获得和损失的等价性。基于这些数据,一项使用联想条件反射范式的实验评估了整个成年期奖赏性和厌恶性学习的程度和时间动态(n=122,19-80 岁)。结果表明,与损失相比,年轻人以更高的学习速度形成与获得相关的联系。相比之下,随着年龄的增长,成年人会更快地追踪与损失相关的条件刺激的价值,而不是与获得相关的条件刺激。这种不同的学习模式不能归因于年龄差异引起的兴奋或预期。结果表明,在老年组中,损失的负面效价更有效地促进学习,而年轻组对获得的正面效价更为敏感。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Adult age-related differences in appetitive and aversive associative learning.成人年龄相关的食欲和厌恶联想学习差异。
Emotion. 2021 Sep;21(6):1239-1251. doi: 10.1037/emo0000860. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Motivational state controls the prediction error in Pavlovian appetitive-aversive interactions.动机状态控制着巴甫洛夫式的食欲-厌恶交互作用中的预测误差。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Jan;147:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
Distinct Contributions of Ventromedial and Dorsolateral Subregions of the Human Substantia Nigra to Appetitive and Aversive Learning.人类黑质腹内侧和背外侧亚区对奖赏性和厌恶性学习的不同贡献。
J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 21;35(42):14220-33. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2277-15.2015.
4
The Human Centromedial Amygdala Contributes to Negative Prediction Error Signaling during Appetitive and Aversive Pavlovian Gustatory Learning.人类中央杏仁核在味觉奖赏和惩罚性条件反射学习中对负预测误差信号的产生有贡献。
J Neurosci. 2023 Apr 26;43(17):3176-3185. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0926-22.2023. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
5
Mechanisms of attention for appetitive and aversive outcomes in Pavlovian conditioning.在巴甫洛夫条件反射中,对奖赏和惩罚结果的注意机制。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Nov 12;213(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.019. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
6
From safety to frustration: The neural substrates of inhibitory learning in aversive and appetitive conditioning procedures.从安全到挫折:厌恶和奖赏条件反射程序中抑制性学习的神经基质。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2023 Jul;202:107757. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107757. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
7
The lesser evil: Pavlovian-instrumental transfer & aversive motivation.较小的恶:巴甫洛夫-工具性转移与厌恶性动机。
Behav Brain Res. 2021 Aug 27;412:113431. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113431. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
8
The strength of aversive and appetitive associations and maladaptive behaviors.厌恶与喜好联想以及适应不良行为的强度。
IUBMB Life. 2014 Aug;66(8):559-71. doi: 10.1002/iub.1310. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
9
Stress effects on memory retrieval of aversive and appetitive instrumental counterconditioning in men.压力对男性厌恶和渴望工具性条件反射记忆提取的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2022 Dec;196:107697. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107697. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Appetitive and aversive outcome associations modulate exogenous cueing.正向和负向结果关联调节外源性线索提示。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2253-65. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1107-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of reduced sensitivity to information about uncertainty during valuation in older adults: An fNIRS study.老年人估值过程中对不确定性信息敏感度降低的神经关联:一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jun 24;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.61. eCollection 2025.