Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Unfallchirurg. 2021 Dec;124(Suppl 1):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s00113-021-01016-4. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
The number of primary arthroplasties is increasing and the proportion of revision arthroplasties is becoming increasingly more important. The need for standardized and guideline-based diagnostics for the safe detection of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming apparent. In the past 10 years various organizations have published definitions and diagnostic guidelines. The implementation of an inhouse standard test kit could help to simplify the process and could improve the diagnostic quality.
In 2016 a test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, taking the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria 2014 and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria into account, which also fulfils the definitions of the ICM criteria 2018 and criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society 2021. The test kit was implemented in the clinical setting of a special department for aseptic and septic revision arthroplasty. The usability and accuracy of the test kit were examined.
The test kit was implemented using blood samples (leukocyte count; C‑reactive protein, CRP), samples for examining the synovial fluid (white blood cell count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA, leukocyte esterase test strips) together with information and request forms. Between April 2016 and February 2020 a total of 405 patients were investigated. Within 3 calendar years, the use of the test kit increased from 59% initially to 86%, and finally to 96% of cases in the third calendar year. The leukocyte esterase test strip was reliable in only 72%, due to undifferentiated readability or blood contamination. The costs increased by the only commercially available alpha-defensin ELISA test by approx. 52€ per puncture. The best individual test showed a sensitivity/specificity of 92.8%/95.2% with alpha-defensin. It was calculated which combinations showed a similar test quality and different combinations, such as CRP+ cell count+ microbiology showed a sensitivity/specificity both of around 90%. Metallosis is a challenge for preoperative PJI diagnostics.
In a prospective study it was shown, that the implementation of the standardized test kit lead to a guideline based PJI diagnostic in all cases and thus to a significantly increase of the diagnostic quality. There is currently no single test that reliably excludes or proves an infection. The alpha-defensin laboratory ELISA test showed the best test accuracy, whereby the consideration of test combinations is obligatory and at the same time safe.
初次关节置换术的数量不断增加,翻修关节置换术的比例也越来越重要。为了安全地检测假体周围关节感染(PJI),需要标准化和基于指南的诊断方法,这一点变得越来越明显。在过去的 10 年中,各种组织已经发布了定义和诊断指南。内部标准检测试剂盒的实施有助于简化流程,并提高诊断质量。
在 2016 年的一项单中心前瞻性研究中,我们编译了一个检测试剂盒,该试剂盒考虑了 2014 年国际共识会议(ICM)标准和美国感染病学会(IDSA)标准,同时也符合 2018 年 ICM 标准的定义和 2021 年欧洲骨与关节感染学会的标准。该检测试剂盒在无菌和感染性翻修关节置换的专科病房的临床环境中得到了实施。我们检查了检测试剂盒的可用性和准确性。
该检测试剂盒使用血样(白细胞计数;C 反应蛋白,CRP)、关节液样本(白细胞计数、PMN 细胞分化、培养 14 天的微生物学、α-防御素酶联免疫吸附试验,ELISA、白细胞酯酶测试条),以及信息和请求表进行检测。2016 年 4 月至 2020 年 2 月,共对 405 例患者进行了调查。在 3 个日历年内,检测试剂盒的使用率从最初的 59%增加到 86%,最终在第三个日历年内达到 96%。由于白细胞酯酶测试条的可读性或血液污染,其可靠性仅为 72%。由于仅有的商业化α-防御素 ELISA 检测试剂盒的使用,每次穿刺的费用增加了约 52 欧元。单独检测中,α-防御素的灵敏度/特异性最高,为 92.8%/95.2%。我们还计算了哪些组合具有相似的检测质量,以及哪些不同的组合,如 CRP+细胞计数+微生物学,其灵敏度/特异性均约为 90%。金属沉着病是术前 PJI 诊断的一个挑战。
在一项前瞻性研究中,我们发现,标准化检测试剂盒的实施使所有病例都能基于指南进行 PJI 诊断,从而显著提高了诊断质量。目前还没有一种单一的检测方法能够可靠地排除或证实感染。α-防御素实验室 ELISA 检测的准确性最高,同时,考虑到检测组合是强制性的,也是安全的。