Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停后是否应延长神经功能恢复的观察期?

Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiology Division), National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):389-397. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005264.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the recommended observation period of 7 days for cardiac arrest survivors is sufficient for conscious recovery and to identify the variables associated with eventual neurologic recovery among patients with delayed awakening.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Five-hundred twenty-nine nontraumatic adult cardiac arrest survivors with prearrest favorable neurologic function (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) who survived to hospital discharge during 2011-2019.

INTERVENTIONS

The enrolled patients were classified into favorable (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) and poor (Cerebral Performance Category 3-4) neurologic recovery according to their neurologic function at hospital discharge. Among patients with favorable neurologic recovery, those who recovered within 7 days were assigned to the early recovery group or after 7 days as the late recovery group.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were 395 patients exhibiting favorable neurologic recovery (n = 357 in the early group, n = 38 in late group) and 134 patients exhibiting poor neurologic recovery (poor recovery group). Among patients who remained unconscious on day 7, delayed awakening was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.905; 95% CI, 1.153-13.221), prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 7.628; 95% CI, 2.084-27.922), therapeutic hypothermia (OR, 4.320; 95% CI, 1.624-11.488), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 4.508; 95% CI, 1.414-14.371). Being transferred from another hospital, however, was less likely to be associated with delayed awakening (OR, 0.061; 95% CI, 0.009-0.431). The median duration for patients to regain clear consciousness in the late recovery group was 12.12 days. No patient who recovered consciousness had an unfavorable electroencephalography pattern, however, in patients with poor recovery, the 7-day electroencephalography showed 45 patients with generalized suppression (33.6%), two with burst suppression (1.5%), 14 with seizure/epileptic discharge (10.5%), and one with status epilepticus (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 9.6% of cardiac arrest patients with favorable outcomes recover consciousness after the recommended 7 days of observation, indicating the observation time of 7 days seems justified but longer duration may be needed. The results of the culturally and clinically isolated population may limit the application to other population.

摘要

目的

评估心脏骤停幸存者推荐的 7 天观察期是否足以实现意识恢复,并确定延迟苏醒患者中与最终神经恢复相关的变量。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家单一的三级医疗中心。

患者

2011 年至 2019 年间,529 名非创伤性成年心脏骤停幸存者,在心脏骤停前具有良好的神经功能(Cerebral Performance Category 1-2),并在出院时存活。

干预措施

根据出院时的神经功能,将入组患者分为良好(Cerebral Performance Category 1-2)和不良(Cerebral Performance Category 3-4)神经恢复。在具有良好神经恢复的患者中,那些在 7 天内恢复的患者被分配到早期恢复组,而在 7 天后恢复的患者被分配到晚期恢复组。

测量和主要结果

有 395 名患者表现出良好的神经恢复(早期组 357 名,晚期组 38 名),134 名患者表现出不良的神经恢复(不良恢复组)。在第 7 天仍无意识的患者中,延迟苏醒与男性(比值比[OR],3.905;95%置信区间[CI],1.153-13.221)、院外自主循环恢复(OR,7.628;95%CI,2.084-27.922)、治疗性低温(OR,4.320;95%CI,1.624-11.488)和体外心肺复苏(OR,4.508;95%CI,1.414-14.371)相关。然而,从另一家医院转来的患者不太可能出现延迟苏醒(OR,0.061;95%CI,0.009-0.431)。在晚期恢复组中,患者恢复清醒的中位时间为 12.12 天。然而,没有恢复意识的患者脑电图模式不佳,在恢复不良的患者中,7 天的脑电图显示 45 例患者出现广泛抑制(33.6%),2 例出现爆发抑制(1.5%),14 例出现癫痫发作/癫痫放电(10.5%),1 例出现癫痫持续状态(0.7%)。

结论

多达 9.6%的预后良好的心脏骤停患者在推荐的 7 天观察期后恢复意识,这表明 7 天的观察时间似乎是合理的,但可能需要更长的时间。文化和临床隔离人群的结果可能限制了其在其他人群中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7de2/8855944/aab0f17f40f8/ccm-50-0389-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验