Department of Psychology, University of Texas, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Military Health Institute, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2021 Oct;58(10):e13903. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13903. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
Selection and effort are central to attention, yet it is unclear whether they draw on a common pool of cognitive resources, and if so, whether there are differences for early versus later stages of cognitive processing. This study assessed effort by quantifying the vigilance decrement, and spatial processing at early and later stages as a function of time-on-task. Participants performed an auditory spatial attention task, with occasional "catch" trials requiring no response. Psychophysiological measures included bilateral cerebral blood flow (transcranial Doppler), pupil dilation, and blink rate. The shape of attention gradients using reaction time indexed early processing, and did not significantly vary over time. Later stimulus-response conflict was comparable over time, except for a reduction to left hemispace stimuli. Target and catch trial accuracy decreased with time, with a more abrupt decrease for catch versus target trials. Diffusion decision modeling found progressive decreases in information accumulation rate and non-decision time, and the adoption of more liberal response criteria. Cerebral blood flow increased from baseline and then decreased over time, particularly in the left hemisphere. Blink rate steadily increased over time, while pupil dilation increased only at the beginning and then returned towards baseline. The findings suggest dissociations between resources for selectivity and effort. Measures of high subjective effort and temporal declines in catch trial accuracy and cerebral blood flow velocity suggest a standard vigilance decrement was evident in parallel with preserved selection. Different attentional systems and classes of computations that may account for dissociations between selectivity versus effort are discussed.
选择和努力是注意力的核心,但目前尚不清楚它们是否利用了共同的认知资源,如果是,那么在认知处理的早期和晚期阶段是否存在差异。本研究通过量化警觉衰减来评估努力程度,并根据任务时间评估早期和晚期的空间处理。参与者执行听觉空间注意任务,偶尔会出现不需要反应的“捕获”试验。心理生理测量包括双侧大脑血流(经颅多普勒)、瞳孔扩张和眨眼率。使用反应时间索引的注意力梯度的形状表示早期处理,并且不会随时间显著变化。随着时间的推移,后期的刺激-反应冲突是可比的,除了左半空间刺激的减少。目标和捕获试验的准确性随时间下降,捕获试验的准确性比目标试验下降得更突然。扩散决策建模发现信息积累率和非决策时间的逐渐下降,以及更宽松的响应标准的采用。大脑血流从基线增加,然后随时间减少,特别是在左半球。眨眼率随时间稳步增加,而瞳孔扩张仅在开始时增加,然后返回基线。研究结果表明,选择性和努力之间存在资源分离。高主观努力和捕获试验准确性以及大脑血流速度随时间下降的测量表明,标准警觉衰减与保留选择并行存在。讨论了可能解释选择性与努力之间差异的不同注意系统和类计算。