Suppr超能文献

听觉空间注意梯度和认知控制作为警觉功能的函数。

Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Military Health Institute, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2021 Oct;58(10):e13903. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13903. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Abstract

Selection and effort are central to attention, yet it is unclear whether they draw on a common pool of cognitive resources, and if so, whether there are differences for early versus later stages of cognitive processing. This study assessed effort by quantifying the vigilance decrement, and spatial processing at early and later stages as a function of time-on-task. Participants performed an auditory spatial attention task, with occasional "catch" trials requiring no response. Psychophysiological measures included bilateral cerebral blood flow (transcranial Doppler), pupil dilation, and blink rate. The shape of attention gradients using reaction time indexed early processing, and did not significantly vary over time. Later stimulus-response conflict was comparable over time, except for a reduction to left hemispace stimuli. Target and catch trial accuracy decreased with time, with a more abrupt decrease for catch versus target trials. Diffusion decision modeling found progressive decreases in information accumulation rate and non-decision time, and the adoption of more liberal response criteria. Cerebral blood flow increased from baseline and then decreased over time, particularly in the left hemisphere. Blink rate steadily increased over time, while pupil dilation increased only at the beginning and then returned towards baseline. The findings suggest dissociations between resources for selectivity and effort. Measures of high subjective effort and temporal declines in catch trial accuracy and cerebral blood flow velocity suggest a standard vigilance decrement was evident in parallel with preserved selection. Different attentional systems and classes of computations that may account for dissociations between selectivity versus effort are discussed.

摘要

选择和努力是注意力的核心,但目前尚不清楚它们是否利用了共同的认知资源,如果是,那么在认知处理的早期和晚期阶段是否存在差异。本研究通过量化警觉衰减来评估努力程度,并根据任务时间评估早期和晚期的空间处理。参与者执行听觉空间注意任务,偶尔会出现不需要反应的“捕获”试验。心理生理测量包括双侧大脑血流(经颅多普勒)、瞳孔扩张和眨眼率。使用反应时间索引的注意力梯度的形状表示早期处理,并且不会随时间显著变化。随着时间的推移,后期的刺激-反应冲突是可比的,除了左半空间刺激的减少。目标和捕获试验的准确性随时间下降,捕获试验的准确性比目标试验下降得更突然。扩散决策建模发现信息积累率和非决策时间的逐渐下降,以及更宽松的响应标准的采用。大脑血流从基线增加,然后随时间减少,特别是在左半球。眨眼率随时间稳步增加,而瞳孔扩张仅在开始时增加,然后返回基线。研究结果表明,选择性和努力之间存在资源分离。高主观努力和捕获试验准确性以及大脑血流速度随时间下降的测量表明,标准警觉衰减与保留选择并行存在。讨论了可能解释选择性与努力之间差异的不同注意系统和类计算。

相似文献

1
Auditory spatial attention gradients and cognitive control as a function of vigilance.
Psychophysiology. 2021 Oct;58(10):e13903. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13903. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
2
Auditory vigilance task performance and cerebral hemodynamics: effects of spatial uncertainty.
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jul;242(7):1787-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06857-0. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
3
Neuroticism and vigilance revisited: A transcranial doppler investigation.
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
4
Transcranial Doppler sonography reveals sustained attention deficits in young adults diagnosed with ADHD.
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Feb;237(2):511-520. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5432-y. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Cerebral blood flow modulations during antisaccade preparation in chronic hypotension.
Psychophysiology. 2019 Mar;56(3):e13305. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13305. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
6
Cerebral hemovelocity reveals differential resource allocation strategies for extraverts and introverts during vigilance.
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Feb;234(2):577-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4481-8. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
7
The effects of self-control on cognitive resource allocation during sustained attention: a transcranial Doppler investigation.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jul;233(7):2215-23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4291-z. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Detection of vigilance performance using eye blinks.
Appl Ergon. 2014 Mar;45(2):354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.020. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
The Neuroergonomics of Vigilance.
Hum Factors. 2017 Feb;59(1):62-75. doi: 10.1177/0018720816683121.

引用本文的文献

1
Front-back asymmetries in endogenous auditory spatial attention.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):511-530. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02995-3. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Reducing alertness does not affect line bisection bias in neurotypical participants.
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Jan;242(1):195-204. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06738-y. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring attention and vigilance in the laboratory vs. online: The split-half reliability of the ANTI-Vea.
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1124-1147. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01483-4. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
The relationship between alertness and spatial attention under simulated shiftwork.
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 11;10(1):14946. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71800-6.
3
Divergent response-time patterns in vigilance decrement tasks.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Oct;46(10):1058-1076. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000813. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Concurrent working memory load may increase or reduce cognitive interference depending on the attentional set.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jul;46(7):667-680. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000740. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
Phasic alerting facilitates endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related lateralizations of the EEG.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1644-1653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01958-3.
7
The ANT Executive Control Index: No Evidence for Temporal Decrement.
Hum Factors. 2021 Mar;63(2):254-273. doi: 10.1177/0018720819880058. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
8
Experience-Driven Auditory Attention.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;23(11):927-937. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
9
Dynamics of auditory spatial attention gradients.
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104058. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104058. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
10
Interactions between spatial attention and alertness in healthy adults: A meta-analysis.
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验