Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, INSERM U1015, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;39(27):2979-2990. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00124. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
The VIT-0910 trial was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of the vincristine-irinotecan combination with and without temozolomide (VIT and VI, respectively) in relapsed or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).
In this randomized European phase II trial, patients age 0.5-50 years received 21-day cycles combining vincristine (1.5 mg/m once a day on day 1 and day 8) and irinotecan (50 mg/m once a day from day 1 to day 5) with and without temozolomide (125 mg/m once a day from day 1 to day 5 and 150 mg/m once a day from cycle 2), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate after two cycles. Secondary end points included best response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. A Simon 2-stage design was initially planned to separately analyze 40 patients/arm. After amendment, the trial sample size was increased to 120 and a comparison between arms, adjusted for confounding factors, was added to the statistical plan (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01355445).
Overall, 120 patients (60 per arm) were recruited in 37 European centers. The median age was 11 years (range, 0.75-45); 89% of patients had a relapsed RMS. The objective response rate was 44% (24 of 55 evaluable patients) for VIT versus 31% (18 of 58) for VI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.22 to 1.12; = .09). The VIT arm achieved significantly better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; = .006) compared with VI, with consistent progression-free survival results (adj-hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.01; = .059). Overall, patients experienced adverse events ≥ grade 3 more frequently with VIT than VI (98% 78%, respectively; = .009), including a significant excess of hematologic toxicity (81% 61%; = .025).
The addition of temozolomide to VI improved chemotherapy efficacy for patients with relapsed RMS, with manageable increase in toxicity. VIT is considered the new standard treatment in these patients in the European paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group and will be the control arm in the next randomized trial.
VIT-0910 试验旨在评估长春新碱-伊立替康联合(VIT 组)和不联合(VI 组)替莫唑胺治疗复发性或难治性横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)的疗效和安全性。
这是一项在欧洲进行的随机 II 期试验,年龄在 0.5-50 岁的患者接受 21 天周期的治疗,方案为长春新碱(1.5mg/m,第 1 天和第 8 天各 1 次)和伊立替康(50mg/m,第 1 天至第 5 天各 1 次)联合(VIT 组)或不联合(VI 组)替莫唑胺(125mg/m,第 1 天至第 5 天各 1 次和第 2 周期起每天 150mg/m),直至疾病进展或出现不可耐受的毒性。主要终点为两周期后客观缓解率。次要终点包括最佳缓解、无进展生存期、总生存期和不良事件。最初计划采用 Simon 两阶段设计分别分析 40 例患者/臂。修改后,试验样本量增加至 120 例,并增加了两臂间的比较,对混杂因素进行了调整(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01355445)。
共有 37 个欧洲中心的 120 例患者(每组 60 例)入组。中位年龄为 11 岁(范围:0.75-45 岁);89%的患者 RMS 复发。VIT 组的客观缓解率为 44%(55 例可评估患者中的 24 例),VI 组为 31%(58 例中的 18 例)(调整后的优势比,0.50;95%CI,0.22 至 1.12; =.09)。VIT 组的总生存期显著优于 VI 组(调整后的危险比,0.55;95%CI,0.35 至 0.84; =.006),无进展生存期结果一致(调整后风险比,0.68;95%CI,0.46 至 1.01; =.059)。总体而言,VIT 组发生≥3 级不良事件的患者比 VI 组更常见(98% 比 78%; =.009),包括血液学毒性显著增加(81% 比 61%; =.025)。
替莫唑胺联合 VI 提高了复发性 RMS 患者的化疗疗效,毒性增加可控制。VIT 被认为是欧洲儿科软组织肉瘤组中这些患者的新标准治疗方法,也将是下一次随机试验的对照组。