Sun Jie, Chen Guo-Mei, Huang Ji
Department of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, People's Republic of China.
The Affiliated Taicang Hospital of Suzhou University, Taicang, People's Republic of China.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jul 25;15:1661-1670. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S316008. eCollection 2021.
We aimed to determine the effects of using evidence-based pharmacy care on satisfaction and cognition among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and taking rivaroxaban.
Between July 2018 and June 2019, 200 consecutive hospitalized patients taking oral rivaroxaban, who were diagnosed with NVAF and registered in the hospital information management system, were randomly assigned to a control group (n=100) and a study group (n=100) in a single-blind manner. The control group received pharmaceutical care based on the general pharmaceutical care model whereas the study group received care based on an evidence-based pharmaceutical care model. Patients' satisfaction and cognition were evaluated regularly using questionnaires. The follow-up time was 1 year. We compared differences in satisfaction and cognition between the two groups after pharmaceutical-related care administered by clinical pharmacists.
The study group had higher satisfaction scores than the control group after the EBP intervention (14.58±0.88 vs.13.81±1.01, p<0.01); cognition scores were also higher in the study group (22.58±2.19 vs 20.80±3.02, p<0.01) after the intervention. In the study group, satisfaction was increased from a score of 10.15±1.33 before the EBP intervention. Cognition also increased after the intervention in the study group, from a score of 9.88±4.09 pre-intervention. In the control group, satisfaction was 10.04±1.29 before the traditional pharmaceutical care intervention, smaller than the 13.81±1.01 after the intervention (p<0.01). Cognition in the control group was 9.83±3.51 before traditional pharmaceutical care, smaller than the 20.80±3.02 after the intervention (p<0.01).
The care model based on evidence-based pharmacy care can improve patient satisfaction and cognition, providing more comprehensive safety and efficacy of subsequent medication.
我们旨在确定循证药学服务对非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)且正在服用利伐沙班的患者的满意度和认知度的影响。
在2018年7月至2019年6月期间,将200例连续住院的口服利伐沙班、被诊断为NVAF并登记在医院信息管理系统中的患者,以单盲方式随机分为对照组(n = 100)和研究组(n = 100)。对照组接受基于常规药学服务模式的药学服务,而研究组接受基于循证药学服务模式的服务。定期使用问卷评估患者的满意度和认知度。随访时间为1年。我们比较了临床药师提供药学相关服务后两组在满意度和认知度方面的差异。
循证药学服务干预后,研究组的满意度得分高于对照组(14.58±0.88对13.81±1.01,p<0.01);干预后研究组的认知度得分也更高(22.58±2.19对20.80±3.02,p<0.01)。在研究组中,循证药学服务干预前满意度得分为10.15±1.33,干预后有所提高。研究组干预后认知度也有所提高,干预前得分为9.88±4.09。在对照组中,传统药学服务干预前满意度为10.04±1.29,低于干预后的13.81±1.01(p<0.01)。对照组在传统药学服务前认知度为9.83±3.51,低于干预后的20.80±3.02(p<0.01)。
基于循证药学服务的服务模式可提高患者满意度和认知度,为后续用药提供更全面的安全性和有效性。